Relativity Sleeping Beauties in Theoretical Physics: 26 Surprising Insights

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the book "Sleeping Beauties in Theoretical Physics: 26 Surprising Insights," with participants expressing interest in its content and readability. One user notes ownership of the book but has not yet read it, highlighting the challenge of finding time for reading. Concerns are raised about the book's accessibility, particularly regarding the level of understanding required, with a comparison to the knowledge of a 2nd or 3rd-year physics student. It is suggested that the book includes a significant amount of equations, indicating a need for a solid mathematical background. While it is not intended to replace traditional textbooks, it is viewed as a potentially valuable supplementary read for those who have completed foundational physics courses.
ibkev
Messages
131
Reaction score
60
This book Sleeping Beauties in Theoretical Physics: 26 Surprising Insights sounds pretty cool as something to read for fun. Has anyone looked at it yet? I'm wondering also what level of reader it's been written for?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/3319134426/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
smodak said:
I own the book but have not read it yet. So much to read, so little time...
The Springer site has better previews...
http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319134420
Yeah those previews are the same as the ones on Amazon and are what got me thinking it sounds really cool! ... the main problem I have is they don't say enough for me to tell whether this book will be way over my head or not. My knowledge is similar I think to what a 2 or 3rd year physics student would know (I forget what sophmore/junior/etc mean in the US.

In engineering we would say I "know enough to be dangerous" LOL
 
As far as I feel, Thanu Padmanabhan wrote good books (one really good on GR, another not that much on QFT). I am pretty sure this is a good writing as well. I hope your mathematical level is high enough, as this book seems to include a fair level of equations. This shouldn't replace a conventional textbook on any subject, but I believe it can serve as a useful read after you've gone past the major courses in physics (classical mechanics, electrodynamics + special relativity, quantum mechanics).
 
  • Like
Likes ShayanJ
Ok thanks for the help!
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top