Sliding Rod In A Magnetic Field (w/ Static Friction)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum magnetic field (B) required to initiate sliding of a rod with mass 0.44 kg and length 26 cm carrying a current of 40 A, given a coefficient of static friction (μs) of 0.45. The key equations used include F = I * L * B * sin(θ) for magnetic force and F_friction = F_n * μs for frictional force, where F_n = m * g. The solution involves setting the magnetic force equal to the frictional force and solving for B as a function of the angle θ, ultimately leading to the expression B = (μs * m * g) / (IL * cos(θ) + μs * IL * sin(θ)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic force equations, specifically F = I * L * B * sin(θ)
  • Knowledge of static friction concepts, including F_friction = F_n * μs
  • Familiarity with basic mechanics, including normal force calculations (F_n = m * g)
  • Ability to graph functions and use minimum value functions on calculators
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic fields and forces in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the effects of angle on magnetic force calculations
  • Study static friction in detail, particularly in varying conditions
  • Investigate graphing techniques for optimizing equations in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone tackling problems involving magnetic fields and static friction in mechanics.

SMA83
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the rod in the figure has mass m= 0.44 kg and length 26 cm and the current through it is I= 40 A.

Part A: If the coefficient of static friction is mus= 0.45, determine the minimum magnetic field B (not necessarily vertical) that will just cause the rod to slide. Give the magnitude of B.

Part B: Give the direction of B relative to the vertical (outwards towards us).


Homework Equations



F=I*L*B*sin(theta)
Ffriction=Fn*mus
Fn=m*g

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem seemed straightforward until they mentioned that the magnetic field isn't necessarily vertical. I am able to plug in the numbers and calculate a solution with a vertical megnetic field, but when I have two unknowns (theta and B), I am not sure how to find the angle that would require the smallest value for B.

Note: There is already a thread based on a problem similar to this one here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=303237. I didn't find the explanation sufficient to get me through the problem, however...I guess I'm a little slower than the guy in that thread. Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without the diagram it is hard to be specific, but the idea is to set the magnetic force equal to the friction force and then fill in the detailed force formulas so you can solve for B. The B field will have a component (something like B*sin(A)) in the magnetic force formula and the other component (perhaps B*cos(A) ) will tend to lift the rod, reducing the normal force in the friction formula.

I expect you will end up with B = an expression with some constants and the angle. You could graph the expression as a function of the angle to find what angle gives the minimum value of the magnetic field.
 
Oops, I forgot to upload the image. I'll include it as an attachment here.

So, following what you said, I found:

FN=mg-ILBsin(theta)

which means:

Ffriction=mus(mg-ILBsin(theta))

therefore:

ILBcos(theta)=mus(mg-ILBsin(theta))

Does it look like I'm on the right track so far?
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI_ch27_p59_60.jpg
    GIANCOLI_ch27_p59_60.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 1,166
Looks good!
 
Well, I think I must have done it right because the answer is coming out correctly now. The final equation I put into my calculator look like:

(mus*m*g)/(ILcos(theta)+musILsin(theta))

Of course, I filled in the known variables, which was everything but theta, and used theta as the x-value in my graph. Then I used the minimum value function on my calculator to find where the minimum was, and when rounded to 2 sig figs, masteringphysics seemed to like it. Thanks a lot for your help...I was pretty lost on this one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K