Slightly philosophical question about magnetism

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pterid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of magnetization \textbf{M} in magnetically susceptible materials, specifically isotropic linear diamagnets and paramagnets, when subjected to a uniform external magnetic field. It is established that while \textbf{M} is uniform within a sphere, it is generally non-uniform in other geometries, such as cuboids, due to the influence of shape on magnetization. The relationship between magnetization \textbf{M} and susceptibility \chi is clarified, emphasizing that uniform susceptibility does not guarantee uniform magnetization across all geometries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetization and magnetic susceptibility concepts
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory and boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of the behavior of materials in magnetic fields
  • Basic principles of linear isotropic materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical treatment of magnetization in non-spherical geometries
  • Study the boundary value problems in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the differences in magnetization behavior between various shapes, such as ellipsoids and cuboids
  • Learn about the implications of magnetic susceptibility in practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and engineering students interested in the principles of magnetism and the behavior of materials in magnetic fields.

pterid
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Hello. I am a new poster; I hope I am correctly observing the forum rules.

I have a slightly philosophical question about magnetism. It seems to be very simple, but I am struggling to find myself a convincing answer. Here it is:

- - -

If you place a piece of magnetically susceptible material (for example, an ideal isotropic linear diamagnet or paramagnet) an an uniform external magnetic field, it will acquire a magnetisation [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex], which can be identified with the induced magnetic moment per unit volume. Say the susceptibility, [tex]\chi[/tex], is uniform across the sample. Must the magnetisation also be uniform across the sample?

Is it possible to find a solution in which [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex] varies? Or can we show that there are no such solutions? Are there geometries for which [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex] must be non-uniform?

Standard texts on magnetism that I have seen usually tend to approach a particular geometry (usually an ellipsoid), assume uniform magnetisation, and then show that a solution for the magnetic fields [tex]\textbf{B}[/tex], [tex]\textbf{H}[/tex], [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex] exists. However, ellipsoids are a bit of a special case, as the [tex]\textbf{B}[/tex] & [tex]\textbf{H}[/tex] fields also turn out to be uniform in the sample, and I have reason to think that a uniform-[tex]\textbf{M}[/tex] solution might not work for other geometries e.g. a bar (cuboid).

I have some thoughts on this, but I fear trying to explain them would only confuse the issue. So I would appreciate your thoughts - cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pterid said:
If you place a piece of magnetically susceptible material (for example, an ideal isotropic linear diamagnet or paramagnet) an an uniform external magnetic field, it will acquire a magnetisation [tex]\textbf{M}[/tex], which can be identified with the induced magnetic moment per unit volume. Say the susceptibility, [tex]\chi[/tex], is uniform across the sample. Must the magnetisation also be uniform across the sample?
The magnetization will NOT usually be uniform, because the shape of the object is important.
For a linear, isotropic, homogeneous susceptibility, the calculation of M is mathematically the same as that of P for a dielectric in an electric field. That case is treated in most EM texts as a boundary value problem. It turns out that, for a sphere, M is constant within the sphere, but for any other shape, it is r dependent.
 
pam said:
The magnetization will NOT usually be uniform, because the shape of the object is important.
For a linear, isotropic, homogeneous susceptibility, the calculation of M is mathematically the same as that of P for a dielectric in an electric field. That case is treated in most EM texts as a boundary value problem. It turns out that, for a sphere, M is constant within the sphere, but for any other shape, it is r dependent.

Yes - for any ellipsoid (not just a sphere) the induced magnetisation is uniform; in other cases it cannot be. I think I've sorted that out now - thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K