Small issue regarding the wording of a thermodynamics question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
dregozo

Homework Statement


upload_2018-1-3_20-54-8.png


The issue is the word 'increase' in c)iii), where I'm pretty sure the wording should have been 'decrease' or at least 'change', since both the work done and the heat removed have a negative value.

Homework Equations


dU = dQ + dW (1st law)

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer to c)iii) was -160J.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-3_20-54-8.png
    upload_2018-1-3_20-54-8.png
    33.9 KB · Views: 812
  • upload_2018-1-3_20-54-57.png
    upload_2018-1-3_20-54-57.png
    33.9 KB · Views: 580
on Phys.org
dregozo said:
The issue is the word 'increase' in c)iii), where I'm pretty sure the wording should have been 'decrease' or at least 'change', since both the work done and the heat removed have a negative value.
"Increase" IS change; don't get your knickers in a knot.
 
Can't agree with you there, an answer of -160J can't possibly suit the description of an INCREASE in internal energy!
 
Something seems very wrong with this problem statement. If the initial and final states of the system are thermodynamic equilibrium states for an ideal gas, then we must have that $$\Delta (PV)=nR\Delta T$$ and
$$\Delta U=nC_v\Delta T$$Combining these two equations gives:$$\Delta U=\frac{C_v}{R}\Delta (PV)$$For a monoatomic ideal gas the ratio of the heat capacity to the gas constant is 1.5, and for a diatomic gas, it is 2.5. From the data given in the table, $$\Delta (PV)=-5\ J$$This doesn't seem compatible with the change of -160 J calculated from the work and the heat removed. Thoughts?