Small signal analysis of a cascode amplifier

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the small signal analysis of a cascode amplifier, focusing on determining the voltage gain and addressing the complexities involved in the analysis. Participants explore various aspects of the circuit's behavior under small signal conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about deriving the voltage gain for a cascode amplifier, noting that the circuit seems under-determined and seeking clarification on the small signal model.
  • Another participant suggests that the voltage gain can be simplified by eliminating the M2 FET, stating that the gain would be the same as without M2, specifically Vout/Vin = -gm1*Rds1, under the condition of an infinite load on Vout.
  • A follow-up question is posed regarding the reasoning behind the elimination of M2 and the resulting voltage gain expression.
  • A participant revises their earlier statement, acknowledging a misunderstanding about the configuration of M2's gate and providing a corrected gain expression: Av = -gm1*Rds1*(1+gm2*Rds2).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints regarding the voltage gain of the cascode amplifier, with some participants agreeing on the simplification involving M2 while others question the reasoning and implications of this approach. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore different interpretations and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific circuit configurations and assumptions about load conditions, which may affect the validity of the proposed gain expressions. There is an acknowledgment of potential misunderstandings regarding circuit connections that could influence the analysis.

mulothecook
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello there.

I am stuck trying to figure out the voltage gain of a cascode amplifier from a small signal analysis. The circuit seems to be under-determined for reasons I do not understand or maybe I am missing the perfectly obvious.

Here's my small signal model:
?temp_hash=c064e565f691e7abb408df22a4274b09.png

The only relation I can deduce without using further unknown quantities is the KCL for the vx node:
%7Bds2%7D%7D%20%3D%20v_%7Bin%7D%5Ccdot%20g_%7Bm1%7D%20+%20%5Cfrac%7Bv_x%7D%7Br_%7Bds1%7D%7D.gif

However, I need another relation to eliminate vx in order to solve for vout/vin. The small signal analysis without the cascode works just fine. May I kindly ask somebody to clarify this?M
 

Attachments

  • cascode_ssm.png
    cascode_ssm.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 1,084
Engineering news on Phys.org
Since you have a current source supplying the M2 FET, you can eliminate M2 and the voltage gain is the same as it would be without M2, namely Vout/Vin = -gm1*Rds1.

The small signal at Vx is the same as it is at Vout as long as the load on Vout is infinite, which is the impedance of the current source feeding the drain of M2. With a finite load on Vout, this will not be the result.
 
The Electrician said:
Since you have a current source supplying the M2 FET, you can eliminate M2 and the voltage gain is the same as it would be without M2, namely Vout/Vin = -gm1*Rds1.

Could you explain why this is the case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
104
Views
25K