Smallest Unit of Time: Planck Time Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mephisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Unit
AI Thread Summary
The Planck time, approximately 10^-43 seconds, is often cited as a significant unit in physics, particularly in relation to quantum gravity and the early universe. It is derived from fundamental constants (G, h, c) and represents a scale where classical physics breaks down, making precise measurements impossible without creating black holes. However, some argue that it is not the absolute smallest unit of time, suggesting that shorter intervals may exist but are currently beyond our measurement capabilities. The debate continues between those who view time as continuous versus those who see it as discrete, with no consensus on how to prove either theory. Ultimately, the Planck time serves as a useful reference point in theoretical physics rather than a definitive limit.
Mephisto
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
i read somewhere that the smallest unit of time that makes sense is the Planck time, ~10^-43 seconds. I'd like to know how physicists arrived at this number. Also, why is it so impossible to think of a time step lower than that? What equation exactly is in conflict, and what kind of a conflict is it? For example, do you get a division by 0 if you try to use a lower time, somehow? or what happens?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From wikipedia:
"The following thought experiment illuminates this fact. The task is to measure an object's position by bouncing electromagnetic radiation, namely photons, off it. The shorter the wavelength of the photons, and hence the higher their energy, the more accurate the measurement. If the photons are sufficiently energetic to make possible a measurement more precise than a Planck length, their collision with the object would, in principle, create a minuscule black hole. This black hole would "swallow" the photon and thereby make it impossible to obtain a measurement. A simple calculation using dimensional analysis suggests that this problem arises if we attempt to measure an object's position with a precision to within a Planck length."

The Planck time is the time it takes for a particle traveling at c to cross the Planck length.

Also, dimensional analysis shows that the Planck length is the only length that can be obtained from some mix of the 3 important physical constants G, h, c (up to a scale factor), so this shows that it might (must?) have some physical importance. If space and time are discrete it would seem that the Planck length and time would be the natural units for discreteness.
 
Last edited:
Mephisto said:
i read somewhere that the smallest unit of time that makes sense is the Planck time, ~10^-43 seconds. I'd like to know how physicists arrived at this number. Also, why is it so impossible to think of a time step lower than that? What equation exactly is in conflict, and what kind of a conflict is it? For example, do you get a division by 0 if you try to use a lower time, somehow? or what happens?

thanks
The "Planck time" is just a convenient unit of time for some applications.
It is not a "smallest unit of time" and there is no reason that shorter time intervals
don't exist.
 
that text from wikipedia is so clear. i always thought plank time was the time at which after the big bang no one can describe.

like from t=0s to t=1^-43s physics breaksdown and doesn't describe this period

is this all wrong in which case I've plucked from absolute nothing??
 
To my knowledge there is no "shortest unit of time". There is only an inability to measure time to determine if one actually exists. So far conventional thinking is divided between the uniform flow camp and the discrete unit camp and no one has devised a way to prove or disprove either one.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top