Medical Smart new antiviral concept-DRACO at MIT Lincoln Lab-Todd Rider

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the innovative antiviral concept known as DRACO, developed by Todd Rider at MIT Lincoln Lab. DRACO targets double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which is produced during viral replication, by inducing apoptosis in infected cells. While the concept shows promise in vitro and in preliminary mouse trials, concerns arise regarding its potential impact on beneficial viruses and the indiscriminate nature of the treatment. The effectiveness of DRACO in larger animal models remains untested, raising questions about its viability in vivo.Participants express caution about the evolutionary implications of such treatments, noting that nature may eventually circumvent the approach or lead to unintended consequences. The discussion highlights the challenge of timing in antiviral therapies, as DRACO's effectiveness may diminish if administered after infection is established. The need for further research to address these challenges is emphasized, particularly regarding the treatment's application in real-world scenarios where early detection of viral infections is often difficult.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Smart new antiviral concept--DRACO at MIT Lincoln Lab--Todd Rider

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/antiviral-0810.html

Have to see if the concept can actually work in vivo. There could be some catch. One catch could arise if there are "good" viruses we actually need to be active, or some pervasive harmless type. Because the treatment concept seems to go after all active viruses indiscriminately. It causes the host cell to self-destruct wherever double-stranded RNA is being produced (dsRNA is produced during viral replication).

Looks good in vitro and preliminary trials in mice but has not been tried in larger animals. Here's a link to some PR about Todd Rider and Lincoln Lab.
http://www.ll.mit.edu/60thAnniversary/rider.html

"Rider had the idea to combine a dsRNA-binding protein with another protein that induces cells to undergo apoptosis (programmed cell suicide) — launched, for example, when a cell determines it is en route to becoming cancerous. Therefore, when one end of the DRACO binds to dsRNA, it signals the other end of the DRACO to initiate cell suicide..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org


When I read this research it really raised an eyebrow. But it's a neat idea, targeting the longer RNA found in viruses. It would be great if this could be the next (but better) interferon but I worry that without other research in conjunction one day this will fail as evolution takes it's course.
 


ryan_m_b said:
...without other research in conjunction one day this will fail as evolution takes it's course.

Yes! Evolution does invariably take its course. Sooner or later nature circumvents you or you discover unintended consequences of your bright idea. But it seems like a bold attempt so I'll be rooting for them.

They published in a free online journal, which was nice of them. Here is the PLoS link:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0022572
 


marcus said:
Yes! Evolution does invariably take its course. Sooner or later nature circumvents you or you discover unintended consequences of your bright idea.

Indeed, this is why http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Delhi_metallo-beta-lactamase_1" scares me. Specifically the disturbing lack of political will to address the danger of antibiotic resistance (especially the danger of sudden mass adoption through horizontal transfer).
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Here's another nice analysis about the paper (http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2011/08/22/dracos_new_antivirals_against_pretty_much_everything.php ) that brings up a few new points:
You might have already wondered about my mention of the injection route, since we already give millions of people a year injections to combat viral infection: flu shots. Those, though, are vaccines meant to last the whole season (and beyond). DRACO proteins get cleared out in mice on a time scale of days; they wouldn't be expected to have any long-range immune effects. (Of course, their broad antiviral effects, versus the sometimes way-too-specific nature of a vaccine, is a strong point in their favor). But this brings up another issue that's going to have to be addressed: when you look at the graphs of the mice experiments, you note that the DRACOs were given either on Day 0 or Day -1 compared to the exposure to virus.

That's actually a big deal in this field. The problem with antiviral therapies has always been that you don't usually know that you've been infected until, well, after you've been infected. Sometimes that lag time is rather long, and it's always long enough for the virus to get a good running start. Symptoms, after all, don't occur until things are well under way. In the real world, the two opportunities for antiviral therapies are (1) something that you can take long before you're even exposed, and that lasts for a long time (like a vaccine) or (2) something that you can take after you've already realized that you're sick (like an antiviral drug). So far, the DRACO proteins fall in between these two, and the next challenge for these agents is to see if they can stretch into one or the other.

Because these agents work by killing infected host cells, applying these agents to someone who has already been infected may produce unacceptable levels of cell death and may not actually be effective in helping the patient.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top