Calculating Relative Brightness of Type Ia Supernovae

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the concept of "relative brightness" in Type Ia supernovae, which are considered "standard candles" due to their expected uniform brightness. The relative brightness is calculated by comparing the observed brightness of supernovae to a theoretical value based on their distance, using methods like the inverse square law. By knowing the distance to certain supernovae, researchers can estimate their brightness and use that information to infer the distances of others. The calculation relies on the specific mass accumulation process of these supernovae, which leads to a predictable critical mass and subsequent detonation. This methodology allows astrophysicists to accurately assess distances in the universe.
shadishacker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am trying to understand the plot below:
http://supernova.lbl.gov/PDFs/expansionhistoryphystoday.pdf
by S.Perlmutter.
However, I don't get the meaning of the "relative brightness" of SN.
How is it calculated?
Is the brightness of each SN compared to a special one?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The type of supernovae studied are thought to be good so-called "standard candles", i.e., they are all expected to have the same brightness. This is what you can compare to.
 
Orodruin said:
The type of supernovae studied are thought to be good so-called "standard candles", i.e., they are all expected to have the same brightness. This is what you can compare to.
So they suppose what value each SN 's brightness should have and then reduce the value from the observed one?!
 
As I can see in the plot, it should be some logarithmic relation. right?
 
The way it's done is to compare distances as estimated by supernovae to distances estimated using other methods. So if we know how far away some supernovae are, we can calculate how bright they are. Then we can use the brightness of other supernovae to estimate how far away they are.
 
The relative brightness is how bright it appears to you. Imagine you are in a dark room, with a single light bulb at some distance away from you. You know that the bulb is putting out 1000 lumens, but your light meter reads 10 lumens, you can use the inverse square law to determine exactly how far away the bulb is.

We can do the same with that very particular type of supernova because of how it works, it slowly accretes mass until it reaches a very specific critical mass and detonates. Astrophysicists have already calculated the critical number and expanding on that using the same laws of physics, you can calculate precisely how bright it much be.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top