SO(10) -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) -inflation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential inflationary scenarios arising from the symmetry breaking of SO(10) to SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1). Participants explore theoretical aspects of inflation, referencing historical papers and considering the implications of different grand unified theories (GUTs) on inflationary models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Andrei Linde's 1982 paper suggesting a phase transition from SU(5) and questions the viability of SO(10) in similar inflationary contexts.
  • Another participant notes three aspects that may differentiate inflationary scenarios: the shape of the scalar field potential, couplings to other fields affecting reheating, and the production of monopoles.
  • There is a suggestion that these three aspects should also be investigated in the context of an SO(10) model, though no specific references are found.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the existing literature on SO(10) related inflationary scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of literature regarding SO(10) inflationary models, and there are differing levels of familiarity with GUT theories among them.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific references to studies on SO(10) inflation scenarios and the dependence on the definitions of scalar field potentials and couplings in GUT theories.

EL
Science Advisor
Messages
558
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to learn some theory of inflation, and recently read a paper by Andrei Linde from 1982 where he suggested a scenario where inflation is driven by the phase transition SU(5) -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1). Now SU(5) is known to not be a good candidate as an extension of the standard model, but what about SO(10)? I wonder if anyone has studied what kind of inflation scenario a spontaneous symmetrybreaking of the kind SO(10) -> SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) could give? Anyone knows any refs?
 
Space news on Phys.org
There must be someone here knowing about inflation?
The reference to Linde's paper is:
Linde A.D., "A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems", Physics Letters B, Volume 108, Issue 6, p. 389-393.
 
I cannot give you an answer, but it is a pitty if this question gets forgotten. I can share some thoughts with you about this, but keep in mind that I do not know anything about these GUT theories. I guess there are mainly three aspects that may differentiate both inflationary scenarios:

- The shape of the scalar field potential, that will determine the duration of inflation and how it takes place.
- The couplings to the other fields, that will determine how reheating takes place and therefore production of matter.
- The quantity and masses of monopoles that may be created. Historically, the reason for Alan Guth to postulate inflation was to find a mechanism to remove GUT monopoles from the observable universe.
 
hellfire said:
I guess there are mainly three aspects that may differentiate both inflationary scenarios:

- The shape of the scalar field potential, that will determine the duration of inflation and how it takes place.
- The couplings to the other fields, that will determine how reheating takes place and therefore production of matter.
- The quantity and masses of monopoles that may be created. Historically, the reason for Alan Guth to postulate inflation was to find a mechanism to remove GUT monopoles from the observable universe.

Yes, I really think those three points must have been investigated for an SO(10)-model too, but I just cannot find any such paper, which surprises me a bit.

Btw, the ref to Guth's "inflation-paper" is:
A.H. Guth, "Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems", Phys.Rev.D23 (1981) 347.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K