So, a weird question about water and oil separation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of water and oil separation, particularly regarding the rate of separation and its dynamics. It highlights that phase separation is influenced by buoyancy and can be affected by factors such as surfactants, which stabilize emulsions. The conversation acknowledges that this topic is an active area of research with significant implications in industries like food and consumer products. The participant expresses a desire to conceptualize physics without heavy reliance on mathematics, aiming to visualize problems before applying mathematical principles. The overall consensus is that understanding the dynamics of phase separation is intricate and requires consideration of various factors.
DOB87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Well, the question is not weird, but the circumstances are.

I am not a physicist, and I am not studying physics. I am a student at a university, and quite interested in physics, but I am intentionally keeping myself away from taking any more physics classes.

I like to be able to imagine physics without the constraints of the math. I understand that the math has to add up in the end, but so far I have had an issue with it limiting my ability to think through it because I get caught up in numbers before I can see the end result. I've been able to come up with multiple theories so far that match up with currently accepted theories this way, without any previous knowledge that those theories exist.

But, working through what I am currently on, which is a question that no theory has explained thus far, requires that I understand something. It is a simple question from basic chemistry \ physics, but I cannot remember the answer, nor can I find a simple solution online.

When water separates from oil, does the rate of separation accelerate over time, or does it decelerate over time? Or does it accelerate\decelerate with certain concentrations of water vs oil, and finally reach an equilibrium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "the rate of separation". I.e. How do you quantify separation?

Btw, physics without math is silly. The "constraints" that math imposes is that it excludes illogical theories.
 
DOB87 said:
<snip>
When water separates from oil, does the rate of separation accelerate over time, or does it decelerate over time? Or does it accelerate\decelerate with certain concentrations of water vs oil, and finally reach an equilibrium?

The question is not so weird- phase separations are an active area of research and have a lot of practical applications (especially in the food and consumer products industries).

Oil and water form a very simple system, the phase separation is due to buoyancy- in space, oil and water can remain well-mixed for a long period of time. On earth, adding surfactants will stabilize the emulsion. Controlling the dynamics of phase separation (to increase the shelf life of fabric softener, for example) is a multi-billion dollar industry.

Even a simple buoyancy-driven two-fluid phase separation has very complicated dynamics:

http://www.firp.ula.ve/archivos/historicos/57_Chap_Davies.pdf
http://people.umass.edu/mcclemen/FoodEmulsions2008/Presentations(PDF)/(6)Emulsion_Stability.pdf
http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-10-03-05.pdf
 
DaleSpam said:
What is "the rate of separation". I.e. How do you quantify separation?

Btw, physics without math is silly. The "constraints" that math imposes is that it excludes illogical theories.

Sorry, I was very tired last night and had had a few drinks. I did not actually mean that I want to ignore the math. It is more an issue of, if I think too much about the math, I will get distracted and never have the ability to see the bigger picture.

I generally try to visualize a problem in my head and look at it from as many different ways as possible, and imagine myself inside, until I find a configuration that makes sense to me. Then, I try to go back and connect the dots with the math. If I can make the math work, then great, and if not, then I rethink my idea.

I know am being vague, but I'm not that great at explaining my thought processes, and the idea I am trying to grasp right now has no math to completely explain it. Water and oil will not work for me, because I was thinking of it in the wrong way.

Andy Resnick said:
The question is not so weird- phase separations are an active area of research and have a lot of practical applications (especially in the food and consumer products industries).

Oil and water form a very simple system, the phase separation is due to buoyancy- in space, oil and water can remain well-mixed for a long period of time. On earth, adding surfactants will stabilize the emulsion. Controlling the dynamics of phase separation (to increase the shelf life of fabric softener, for example) is a multi-billion dollar industry.

Even a simple buoyancy-driven two-fluid phase separation has very complicated dynamics:

http://www.firp.ula.ve/archivos/historicos/57_Chap_Davies.pdf
http://people.umass.edu/mcclemen/FoodEmulsions2008/Presentations(PDF)/(6)Emulsion_Stability.pdf
http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-10-03-05.pdf

Thanks for the links. They are very interesting. It always amazes me how complex ideas are, even when they seem so simple at first glance.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top