So interested in Physics/ComSci but can't make sense of math

  • Thread starter Thread starter fde645
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of understanding mathematics, particularly in applying abstract concepts like fractions and algebra to concrete problems. The individual expresses frustration with their inability to visualize mathematical operations despite knowing the underlying algorithms. They seek advice on whether to focus on concrete thinking or abstract mathematics and emphasize their desire to grasp these concepts for a better understanding of physics. Contributors highlight that intuition in math often develops through practice and personal application of concepts to unique problems, suggesting that engaging with word problems can bridge the gap between abstract math and real-world applications. They note that many students struggle with this transition, but it is crucial for mastering physics, which relies on translating physical situations into mathematical expressions. The discussion underscores the importance of persistence and finding relatable ways to understand mathematical concepts, such as using analogies or personal interests.
fde645
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
Well I guess I should say a brief summary of my distressing problem. I know math is important, and I know how the algorithm of mathematics is but can't make sense of it visually. Let's take for example fractions I know how to multiply or divide fractions abstractly, but when I am applying it to concrete problems it makes no sense. I don't how to picture dividing 1/2 by 1/4 but can do it abstractly. One thing is algebra, I know the laws of algebra and can solve numbers abstractly, but when it comes to concrete algebra it makes no sense. Please help me I really want physics and I would do anything to solve my problem. Or perhaps I can get an advice on the books that makes math sensible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or should I not worry about thinking concretely, for example, in terms of a circle or a square, and thinking in terms of abstract mathematics is much more better?
 
A lot of understanding comes with practice in my experience. The higher you go with the mathematics, the less intuitive it will be (for most people anyway, there may be some exceptions). When you get used to using a particular tool, after a while, you understand more about it, and then occasionally you'll have one of those "ah-ha" moments and things will suddenly make sense. Other times, you'll think back over something that seems obvious and wonder why it ever wasn't, but won't be able to pinpoint any specific time where you made the transition.

Another thing that really helps with understanding in my experience is to try to apply the material that you've covered in lectures to situations that you haven't encountered of covered in class - problems that you think up for yourself and problems that you have a particular interest in solving.
 
The only thing that is compelling me in sticking to math is my love for physics and my interest in math, if only that transition you say will come sooner. I have no problem with practice, I just feel like I am stupid for not understanding fractions even though I'm in college now. I never really care about math and physics (I blame school for creating an impression that math and science is about memorization, and of course myself for not caring) not until I found out about the laws of quantum physics and general relativity to which is so interesting I can't explain the feeling of knowing more about them.
 
Fractions can be confusing. I tutored many college students in fractions. Using pizza analogies and the like.

If you want to develop a better intuition about it, hit up the word problems in your book. Students traditionally hate word problems because they are hard. Doing math within math alone using memorized rules is easy. Translating physical situations to math is hard. But that is where the power of physics lies, translating a physical situation into math, doing some calculations and then translating that math back into a physical situation. When I tutored freshman physics I would often suggest to the students to think of it that way. A class in physics is a class in word problems (often this is followed by a groan, lol) and the word problems in a math class are an intro into using math scientifically (rather than as a subject in its own right).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top