Software capable of modeling ground grid performance during faults cau

AI Thread Summary
A university project requires modeling the performance of a ground grid during faults from lightning strikes, necessitating various test cases for different grid configurations. The only known software capable of these computations is the HIFREQ module from SES Technologies, but its educational license costs exceed the budget. The discussion seeks alternatives that are either open-source or have affordable educational licenses under $1,000. Two papers utilizing MATLAB for similar modeling are referenced for additional insights. Assistance in finding suitable software options is requested.
Jotamide
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a University project I need to somehow model the effective performance of a ground grid in the event of a fault caused by a lightning strike. We would need to prepare different test cases for different sizes and grid configurations in order to carry out different analysis and find the optimal performance point. So far the only software that I know that is capable of carrying out these computations is the HIFREQ software module from SES Technologies. However, the cost of an educational license is way beyond our budget. Does anyone know of any alternatives that are open-source software or have very cheap educational licenses (below $1k per license)? Any help is appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top