Solar energy flux, Earth's population

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the maximum possible population of Earth based on solar energy flux, which is approximately 1.7 kW/m^2. Participants suggest calculating the energy required for human survival, with a rough estimate of 2,500 Calories or about 10,000 kJ per day per person. There is mention of using an equation related to molecular flux, but the focus is on understanding energy metabolism and conversion efficiency. Hints are provided to guide the original poster in approaching the problem without directly solving it. The conversation concludes with the original poster feeling more confident about tackling the question.
phy
Solar energy flux, Earth's population...

Hi everyone :smile:

I have this one question from my optics course that has me totally stumped. It reads "Solar energy flux at Earth's position is about 1.7kW/m^2. Estimate the maximum possible population of the Earth."

I've looked through my textbook and asked a few people in my class but nobody has been able to come up with anything. Apart from one equation that I found (J=0.25n<c> where J is molecular flux, n is the particle number density and c is the mean molecular speed), I couldn't even start the question. If somebody could maybe just throw out some hints or equations, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can somebody please help me? I don't want anybody to do it for me. Just give me a hint on which direction I should be going in. Lol please? Thanks =)
 
Estimate how much energy, per second, a human needs to stay alive, that is, how much energy a human metabolises in one second.

For extra complexity, you can estimate an energy conversion efficiency, i.e. the percentage of energy incident on the Earth that is converted into energy useful to humans.

Hope that gets you going.

Claude.
 
Uhhhh that actually makes sense but how much energy does the average human metabolize per second?

Does 2500 Calories sound resonable?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
10,000 kJ/day is probably reasonable to a first approximation. In a question like this, you are not looking for precision, just a ball park figure.

Claude.
 
Okie dokie I think I know how to do the question. Thanks a lot for your help :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top