Solid-State EE: Job Market & MS/PHD Prospects

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinyong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Ee
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the career paths and job market for electrical engineers specializing in solid-state technology. Participants note that many graduates typically work as "fab rats" or quality control engineers, ensuring laboratory operations run smoothly and products meet specifications. There is an acknowledgment that pursuing an advanced degree, such as a Master's or PhD, can lead to more complex and rewarding challenges in the field. However, it is emphasized that motivation for pursuing higher education should not solely be based on job prospects or financial gain, as this can lead to dissatisfaction. Instead, understanding the day-to-day responsibilities in the solid-state area is crucial for making informed decisions about further education.
jinyong
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Anyone in here work in the solid-state area of EE? What do people that focus on solid-state do after they graduate? Is the job market okay? I am thinking about focusing on the solid-state area of EE for my MS/PHD. Any help would great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I gather from my solid state classes. Many electrical engineers become "fab rats" or quality control engineers. They make sure that the lab is running smoothly and that the products met the specs. I'm sure with an advance degree you get to work on more challenging problems.
 
you shouldn't go for a phd just because of the job/money opportunites after graduation. that's a recipie for disaster.
 
I'm not doing MS/PHD for job/money. I just want to know what people do in this field for everyday work so I can have a better understanding before I pursue a more advanced degree.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top