Solid State or Nuclear Physics: Which Has More Research Opportunities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crush1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
Choosing between Solid State physics and Nuclear physics for undergraduate study involves considering the current research landscape and future opportunities in each field. Solid State physics, also known as condensed matter physics, is recognized as a larger field with extensive research, particularly in semiconductors like silicon, which is the most studied material. This breadth may suggest more active research opportunities. Conversely, Nuclear physics, while having fewer researchers, could enhance individual worth due to lower competition. Ultimately, the decision hinges on personal interest and the potential for graduate study, as both fields offer unique advantages in research opportunities.
Crush1986
Messages
205
Reaction score
10
Pretty soon in the winter quarter I'll have the chance to take an undergrad course on either Solid State physics or Nuclear physics. Both fields are of interest to me. I'd like to choose the one that has more research currently being done on it though. So that if I end up still liking it I can have a lot of opportunities to enter a grad school that is researching the field and knowing a bit more on the subject than maybe a few other students can give me an edge. The more opportunities the better.

Thanks to anyone for a reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solid state is larger. Whether that makes it more acrive or not is hard to say.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Solid state is larger. Whether that makes it more acrive or not is hard to say.
Thanks. It was my gut feeling that this field had "more to it." It is a hard thing to gauge though. I couldn't find statistics about amount of research being done on particular fields.
 
I think Vanadium is correct in saying S.S aka condensed matter is larger. I've been told silicon (semiconductor) is the most studied material ever. Most grad schools also have a nuclear research area however. Maybe fewer people want to research nuclear so you increase your worth value if you want to study this area. On the other hand, Maybe when more people are in the area, there are more opportunities. Hard to say what to do.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top