Solid State Question: A Confusing Integral in Ashcroft

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
I am trying to undersand Ashcroft's derivation of energy density on page 38. I am following most of the arguments save EQ 2.30. Where did the vector go? I did follow my professors argument for converting to polar/spherical when the argument of a function is a modulus of a vector — exploiting symmetry to make a nice easy integral. However, it is a whole other matter two have an actual vector in the integrand. I would expect it to be dotted into something in order to have it equal a scalar (other than zero). I am scratching my head here. The steps leading up to this are a little long, so I am just leaving it as a reference and hoping you guys have access to this textbook.

Thanks,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's not a vector in the integrand.
$$d\mathbf{k} = dk_x \, dk_y\,dk_z $$
This may be confusing since the total derivative of ##\mathbf{k}## would also be denoted ##d\mathbf{k}##, but I think represents something different. However I believe in this case it just means an integral over k space. So just a somewhat confusing notation.
 
Perfect, thank you.

Chris
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top