Chemistry Solution check for Complex Molecule IUPAC Naming

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the IUPAC naming of complex molecules and the determination of their oxidation states and coordination numbers. The correct names for the complexes are hexaamminenickel(II) for nickel, triamminetrichlorochromium(III) for chromium, and hexanitrocobaltate(III) for cobalt, with the latter reflecting its anionic nature. The ammonia ligand is confirmed to bind through the nitrogen atom, while the nitro ligand can exhibit linkage isomerism, potentially binding through either nitrogen or oxygen. Overall, the oxidation states and coordination numbers were correctly identified, but the naming conventions needed adjustments for accuracy.
pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Given the IUPAC name to the chemical formulas: {\left[ {Ni{{\left( {N{H_3}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{2 + }} \left[ {CrC{l_3}{{\left( {N{H_3}} \right)}_3}} \right] {\left[ {Co{{\left( {N{O_2}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{3 - }}

b) Give the metal oxidation state, Coordination number and distinguish the donar atoms for each complex.

2. The attempt at a solution
{\left[ {Ni{{\left( {N{H_3}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{2 + }}{\rm{ - hexaaminenickate ion}}\left( {II} \right) CN - 6, Metal oxidation state - 2+

\left[ {CrC{l_3}{{\left( {N{H_3}} \right)}_3}} \right]{\rm{ - trisaminetriclorocromate}}\left( {III} \right) CN - 6, Metal oxidation state - 3+

{\left[ {Co{{\left( {N{O_2}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{3 - }}{\rm{ - hexanitrocobalt}}\left( {III} \right){\rm{ ion}} CN - 6, Metal oxidation state 3+


are these soluions correct?
many thanks, pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the good news is you got the oxidation states and coordination numbers right.
Compounds that end in -ate are anions. So the only compound that can be an -ate here is the cobalt one. Starting with the nickel compound, the proper name for a NH3 ligand is ammine, with 2 m's. So the name of [Ni(NH3)6]2+ is hexaamminenickel(II). You can add "ion" to that to make it clear that you're not talking about a neutral species.
For the chromium species, you're almost right: triamminetrichlorochromium(III).
For the cobalt, since the overall species is negative, you can write hexanitrocobaltate(III). Sigma also lists it as hexanitritocobaltate(III). See below.

The reason for the two names has to do with the donor atom question. In the case of ammonia, it's pretty clear the ligand binds through the N atom. For the nitro case, there could be linkage isomerism: meaning that the NO2 group could bind through the nitrogen (in which case it's a "nitro" species), or through the oxygen (in which case it's a "nitrito" species).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top