Maximizing Learning: The Importance of Solution Manuals in Mathematical Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter med17k
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Learning mathematical physics independently can be challenging, particularly due to the lack of solution manuals for exercises in many textbooks. The discussion highlights the difficulty in verifying answers, especially when problems involve proving equalities. While some textbooks, like "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, offer student solution manuals that provide solutions for about half of the problems, others, such as Arfken's book, do not include any solutions. This lack of resources can hinder self-study, leading to questions about the necessity of having a solution manual to ensure correct understanding and problem-solving.
med17k
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi , I'm learning mathematical Physics on my own .but there is a problem that there are no solutions presented for the exercises in the textbooks so how to make sure I found the correct answers? . a lot of problems however requires proving an equality for example but some problems may be hard to solve.Is it essential to have a solution manual for the problems ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
med17k said:
Hi , I'm learning mathematical Physics on my own .but there is a problem that there are no solutions presented for the exercises in the textbooks so how to make sure I found the correct answers? . a lot of problems however requires proving an equality for example but some problems may be hard to solve.Is it essential to have a solution manual for the problems ?

There should be textbooks with solutions for half of the problems. Have you looked for some of them?
 
I have mathematical methods for physics and engineering by arfken but it doesn't have any solution to any problems .
 
I believe "mathematical methods for physics and engineering" by Riley has a student solutions manual with half the problems completed
 
med17k said:
I have mathematical methods for physics and engineering by arfken but it doesn't have any solution to any problems .

I think this is one of the typical complaints I see of the text. There is no solutions available for that text as far as I know.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top