Solve 4 Variable Equation: a,b,c & x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biaqua
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variable
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation a * (x/1000) = b - x * c for x, first multiply both sides by 1000 to eliminate the fraction. This leads to the equation (a/1000)x + cx = b. By combining terms, you can isolate x, resulting in the formula x = b / ((a/1000) + c). Ultimately, this simplifies to x = (1000b) / (a + 1000c). The solution provides a clear method for determining x based on the values of a, b, and c.
Biaqua
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For my work, I need to solve the following equation for the variable x (if possible):

a * (x/1000) = b - x * c

Can someone please help me solve it or inform me that it is simply not possible. I'm chemist myself, so solving equations is not exactly my expertise.

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, add up c*x to both sides of the equation. Then isolate x from the left side.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, but I already got to that point. The thing is that I don't know how to solve the (x/1000) part.
 
Biaqua said:
Thanks, but I already got to that point. The thing is that I don't know how to solve the (x/1000) part.

Multiply both sides by 1000.
 
Just to make it abundantly clear:

\frac{a}{1000} x = b - c x
\frac{a}{1000} x + c x = b
(\frac{a}{1000} + c) x = b
x = \frac{b}{\frac{a}{1000} + c}
x = \frac{1000 b}{a + 1000 c}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
975
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
956
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top