Solve Bouncing Electrons: Find r_min with q, m, v, and k

  • Thread starter Thread starter fubag
  • Start date Start date
fubag
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Bouncing Electrongs

Two electrons, each with mass m and charge q, are released from positions very far from each other. With respect to a certain reference frame, electron A has initial nonzero speed v toward electron B in the positive x direction, and electron B has initial speed 3v toward electron A in the negative x direction. The electrons move directly toward each other along the x-axis (very hard to do with real electrons). As the electrons approach each other, they slow due to their electric repulsion. This repulsion eventually pushes them away from each other.

What is the minimum separation (r_min) that the electrons reach?
Express your answer in term of q, m, v, and k.

All I understand so far is that both electrons are moving at the same nonzero speed in the same direction.

I need help starting this question. I understand that U1 + K1 = U2 + K2 for conservation of energy.

I also understand that U = kqQ/r for a point charge. So in this case I believe U1 = -ke^2/r, and then K1 = mv^2/r. Also I believe U2 = -ke^2/r and K2 = -3mv^2/r.

Please tell me if these are correct assumptions, and what I need to do next.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fubag said:
All I understand so far is that both electrons are moving at the same nonzero speed in the same direction.
If you mean at the moment of minimum separation: good! You'll have to find that speed.

I need help starting this question. I understand that U1 + K1 = U2 + K2 for conservation of energy.
Good.

I also understand that U = kqQ/r for a point charge. So in this case I believe U1 = -ke^2/r, and then K1 = mv^2/r. Also I believe U2 = -ke^2/r and K2 = -3mv^2/r.
Two problems: (1) the potential energy should be positive, since the charges are the same; (2) KE is always positive.

Please tell me if these are correct assumptions, and what I need to do next.
Hint: What else is conserved?
 
ok error on the U1 should be ke^2/r, and K1 = mv^2 and both of these added together must equal U2 = ke^2/r added with K2= 3mv^2/r, where we can take r as minimum.

So since these must be conserved I could just solve for r_min?
 
fubag said:
ok error on the U1 should be ke^2/r, and K1 = mv^2 and both of these added together must equal U2 = ke^2/r added with K2= 3mv^2/r, where we can take r as minimum.
KE = 1/2 mv^2, not mv^2.

So since these must be conserved I could just solve for r_min?
Not until you determine the common speed of the electrons when they reach r_min. Hint: What else is conserved?
 
I am not sure what else must be conserved...given the potential and kinetic energy, I can only think of charge and mass remaining conserved.
 
Nope, there's one more conservation law that you're forgetting. :wink:
 
conservation of linear momentum?
 
Absolutely!
 
ok so kinetic energy and momentum must be conserved in this system.

so (1/2)mv^2 + (3/2)mv^2 = mv^2 (since both electrons move at the same speed in the same direction when they are at their minimum separation)?

change in momentum final must be equal to change in momentum initial.

i think i am doing something wrong
 
  • #10
fubag said:
ok so kinetic energy and momentum must be conserved in this system.
Total mechanical energy is conserved, not kinetic energy.

Use conservation of momentum to figure out the speed the electrons must have at minimum separation. Then you can use conservation of energy to figure out the separation.
 
  • #11
ok this is what I got so far:

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1_f + m2v2_f

based on the information given in the problem:

m1=m2, v1 = v, v2 = 3v, and at their minimum separation they are going the same speed in the same direction so...

mv + 3mv = mv + mv
4mv = 2mv; this equality doesn't make much sense to me, i believe i am still making a mistake somewhere
 
  • #12
direction counts!

fubag said:
m1=m2, v1 = v, v2 = 3v,
They are moving towards each other--opposite directions; thus they should have opposite signs.
 
  • #13
ok so redoing it once again...

mv - 3mv = 2mv_2

v_2 = -v, speed at minimum separation?
 
  • #14
Sounds good.
 
  • #15
ok now that I have the speed during minimum separation, i use the conservation of mechanical energy laws...

as written before

U1 + K1 = U2 + K2; K1 = (mv^2/2) + (m(-3v)^2/2); K2 = (mv^2/2) + (mv^2/2)

(ke^2/r) + (10mv^2/2) = (ke^2/r) + (mv^2)

but in my equation above, I will not be able to solve for r...so once again I think I am missing something
 
  • #16
Since the electrons start from very far away, you can say U1 = 0 (r_1 = infinity). Then just solve for r_2 (which is r_min) in terms of k,q,m, & v.
 
  • #17
ok thank you so much for your help so far Doc Al

this is what I know come up with:


U1 + K1 = U2 = K2

U1 = 0

K1 = 5mv^2; using kinetic energy of both electrons

U2= kq^2/r

K2 = mv^2


Solving for r_min I get (kq^2)/(4mv^2). Does this make sense?
 
  • #18
fubag said:
K2 = mv^2
How did you get this? What's the speed of each electron at r_min?

You're almost done.
 
  • #19
I got K2 by taking -v as the speed of the electron at r_min; and since there are two electrons I added their kinetic energy together. Is this ok to do? so (mv^2/2) + (mv^2/2) = mv^2?
 
  • #20
You're right. (You caught me sleeping!)

Your answer is correct.
 
Back
Top