Solve Bungy Jump Problem: Acceleration at Bottom

  • Thread starter Thread starter ff93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump
AI Thread Summary
To solve the bungee jump problem, start by determining the lowest point of the jump and use conservation of energy, specifically the equation mgh = 1/2kx², where x is the stretch of the bungee cord beyond its unstretched length. The forces acting at the lowest point include the gravitational force (mg) and the spring force (-kx), leading to the equation F = -kx + mg = ma. It's important to express height (h) in terms of x and to focus on the magnitude of acceleration, which will be directed upwards at the lowest point. The discussion emphasizes understanding the signs of forces and the correct application of energy conservation principles.
ff93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
You go bungee jumping from a bridge that is 65m high, the bungee cord has an unstretched length of 32m and a spring constant of k=107 N/m
You have a mass of 75kg.

Question: what is the acceleration at the bottom, closest to the ground?

I`ve tried to use 1/2kA2=1/2mx+1/2kx2
but it doesn´t seem to work for me :(

please help, I´m not asking for U to solve it but at least give me a couple of hints!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by figuring out where the lowest point is. Use conservation of energy.
 
should I use mgh=1/2kx2?

x as how far it stretches from 32m?

and then should I use F=-kx => F=ma and solve out a?
 
ff93 said:
should I use mgh=1/2kx2?

x as how far it stretches from 32m?
Yes. Hint: Express h in terms of x. (Measure gravitational PE from the lowest point.)
 
you mean mg(x+32)=1/2kx2?

should I then continue with F=-kx => F=ma solve out a?
 
ff93 said:
you mean mg(x+32)=1/2kx2?
Exactly.
should I then continue with F=-kx => F=ma solve out a?
Be sure to include all forces when applying F=ma.
 
mg(x+32)=1/2kx2 gives two answers but I can throw away the negative one, right?

then I used F=-kx+mg => a= (-kx+mg)/m
is that right?
 
Last edited:
ff93 said:
mg(x+32)=1/2kx2 gives two answers but I can throw away the negative one, right?
Right.

then I used F=-kx+mg => a= (-kx+mg)/m
is that right?
Yes, that's fine.

Don't get hung up with signs. You have an upward force of magnitude kx and downward force of magnitude mg. Which direction will the acceleration be in at the lowest point?
 
the direction will be "up",negative
right?
 
  • #10
ff93 said:
the direction will be "up",negative
right?
Yes, the acceleration will be up. Which you happen to call negative. I suspect that they only care about the magnitude of that acceleration.
 
  • #11
thank you for the help!:smile:
 
Back
Top