Solve Calculus Problem f(x)=(ax+b)/(x-c)

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelpperson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x) = (ax+b)/(x-c) is analyzed for its properties, leading to the conclusion that c must equal 2 to satisfy the limit condition as x approaches 2 from the right. The symmetry of the graph indicates that f(x) should equal f(-x), which helps establish relationships between a and b. The derivative condition f'(1) = -2 further constrains the values of a and b. The discussion highlights the need for three equations to solve for the three unknowns a, b, and c. Overall, the key to solving the problem lies in correctly applying the conditions of symmetry and limits.
needhelpperson
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
f(x) = (ax+b)/(x-c) has the following properties

i) the graph of f is symmetric with respect to the y-axis
ii) lim x->2^+ f(x) = + infinite
iii) f^prime (1) = -2

a) Determine the values of a, b and c.

i think c = 2

derivative of f(x) = (-ca - b)/(x-c)^2

so f^prime(1) = -2

-ca-b = (1-c)^2 * -2

if c = 2 then b = -2a + 2

I'm stuck from here. I have no idea how to do this. I tried using this equation
(ax+b)/(x-2) = (-ax + b)/(-x-2)

since symmetric over y-axis and i plugged in b, but it turned out to be useless. Please help. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation will be competely determined if you have 3 equations for these three unknowns (a,b,c).

Your equations should be:

1) f(x) = f(-x) for the first condition (an even function)
2) as x goes to 2^+(f(x)) the funciton blows up. the only way the function can blow up is if the numerator goes to infinity or the denominator goes to zero. The numerator will still be finite in this limit so the denominator has to go to zero. so you should have 2^f(x) -c =0 take the natural log of both sides and you should get f(x) = ln c / ln 2 (look up your identities in a math table if this doesn't seem familar)
3) f'(x=1) = -2
 
tiger-striped-cat: I suspect that "ii) lim x->2^+" was meant as "limit as x goes to 2 from above, not 2f(x). In that case, you just have to note that the denominator, x-c, must be 0 when x= 2: 2- c= 0. c= 2 as in the initial post.

Saying that "the graph of f is symmetric with respect to the y-axis" means, as tiger-striped-cat said, that f(x)= f(-x). Instead of doing that in general, just look at a few values of x: if x= 1, f(1)= (a+b)/(1-2)= (-a+b)/(-1-2)= f(-1); if x= 3, f(3)= (3a+b)/(3-2)= (-3a+b)/(-3-1)= f(-3). You may not even need the derivative!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top