Solve Chemistry Problem: 3 NaOH Samples Found at Crime Scene

  • Thread starter Thread starter chemistryhelps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Three samples of NaOH were found at a crime scene, with the concentration of the sample used to kill a Canadian goose identified as 2.0M. Suspect 1 has 160g in a 200ml solution, suspect 2 has 500g in a 500ml solution, and suspect 3 has 40g in a 1L solution. The discussion revolves around calculating the molarity of each suspect's solution to determine potential involvement, with a hypothesis suggesting suspect 3 is the least likely due to insufficient mass. Clarifications are made regarding the definition of molarity and the need for concentration calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the chemical properties and concentrations in solving the case.
chemistryhelps
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I will ask the teacher personally for further explanation (he was absent), but I would like to complete the homework prior to doing so, so I can get an idea of how to resolve this problem.

3 sample of NaOH are found at the scene of a crime. The sample used to kill the Canadian goose had a 2.0M (I assume its moles) concentration

suspect had 1 with her 160g of a 200 ml solution of soln of NaOH
suspect 2 500g of a 500 ml soln of NaOH
suspect 3 40 g of a 1L soln of NaOH

purpose? (not to find the killer)
material
procedure
data
conclusion

my hypothesis is that it is suspect 3

23+16+1= 40 g/mol (molarmass) * 2 mol of the sample = 80 g

first is only lacking 40g, not enough to kill,
second has all the grams
3rd lacks a lot of grams, maybe he didnt have the bottle full of the NaOH
 
Physics news on Phys.org
suspect had 1 with her 160g of a 200 ml solution of soln of NaOH
Hi chemistryhelps,

Don't you mean that when 200 ml of the solution was analyzed it was found to contain 160g of NaOH solid? If so, what molarity would that make it?

Was there a fourth sample at the scene, one of 2M and which allowed investigators to decide that was the concentration used to kill the bird?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What an unusual question! I would start by calculating the concentrations of all three suspects. BTW, 2.0 M is two molar, not 2 moles.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top