Solve Definite Integral: -2 to 0 x[f(x^2)]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the definite integral from -2 to 0 of the expression x[f(x^2)], given that the integral from 0 to 4 of f(x) equals -1. The subject area pertains to integral calculus, specifically the properties of definite integrals and variable substitution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential use of variable substitution, specifically u = x^2, to relate the integrals. There is confusion regarding how to connect the original integral limits to the new variable and the implications of symmetry in the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the substitution method and clarified that the integration variable is a dummy variable, which can be changed without affecting the integral's value. However, there remains some uncertainty about how to properly relate the transformed integral back to the original problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concern over the different limits of integration and the implications of switching them. There is also a mention of a sign error in the context of the transformed integral, indicating that careful attention is needed when dealing with limits and variable changes.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if the integral from 0 to 4 of f(x) = -1

then what is the integral from -2 to 0 of x[f(x^2)]?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



my first instinct is that this is an even/odd definition of an integral problem. the x squared in the function makes it even, which means its symmetrical over the y-axis and thus you can double the area.

however, the x which is being multiplied by f(x^2) is confusing me as is the fact that 0 to 4 isn't the same as -2 to 2 (the symmetrical part).

can someone help me out? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think very seriously about a variable change u=x^2.
 
Dick said:
I would think very seriously about a variable change u=x^2.

thanks for the help but I am still quite confused. i don't understand how to relate the two integrals especially since the two end points are different.
 
ok well i did the u=x^2 substitution and got this:

u = x^2

du = 2x dx

therefore i have:

the integral from 4 to 0 of f(u) du times (1/2)

now, according to the original problem, the integral from 0 to 4 of f(x) is -1.

how do i relate my new integral to the original? i know if i switch the two end points i can simply change the value of the integral by multiplying by -1 but my new integral is with u...the original is with x.
 
For definite integrals, the integration variable is a dummy variable and it van be anything you want. So it doesn't matter the notation, the number the integral is equal to is independent of the way you denote the integration variable.
 
dnt said:
ok well i did the u=x^2 substitution and got this:

u = x^2

du = 2x dx

therefore i have:

the integral from 4 to 0 of f(u) du times (1/2)

now, according to the original problem, the integral from 0 to 4 of f(x) is -1.

how do i relate my new integral to the original? i know if i switch the two end points i can simply change the value of the integral by multiplying by -1 but my new integral is with u...the original is with x.

So you have
[tex]\int_{-2}^0 xf(x^2)dx= \frac{1}{2} \int_0^4 f(u)du[/tex]
and you know what that second integral is!
 
HallsofIvy said:
So you have
[tex]\int_{-2}^0 xf(x^2)dx= \frac{1}{2} \int_0^4 f(u)du[/tex]
and you know what that second integral is!

Halls, you have a sign error in the above. (Limits of integration are switched.)
 
so the answer is:

(-1/2) x (-1) = 1/2

correct?
 
Quite correct.
 
  • #10
thank you.
 
  • #11
dextercioby said:
For definite integrals, the integration variable is a dummy variable and it van be anything you want. So it doesn't matter the notation, the number the integral is equal to is independent of the way you denote the integration variable.

even though i got the answer, I am still interested in learning more about this concept. is there a link that would explain it in more detail (the idea that for definite integrals the integraion variable doesn't really matter).

thanks.
 
  • #12
Any textbook should explain that- it's simply a matter of the fact that the definite integral of a function is a number and so doesn't depend on any variable.
[tex]\int_0^1 x^2 dx= \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
[tex]\int_0^1 y^2 dy= \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
[tex]\int_0^1 t^2 dt= \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
[tex]\int_0^1 a^2 da= \frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Are you surprized?
 
  • #13
not surprised but it still doesn't quite make 100% sense to me yet. i need to keep reading on it until i get it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K