MHB Solve Definite Integral w/ Absolute Value Factor - Yahoo! Answers

Click For Summary
To solve the definite integral ʃ (-18 to 1) [s│81 - s^2 │] ds, the expression within the absolute value is analyzed, revealing it is negative for s in the intervals (-∞, -9) and (9, ∞). The integral is split into two parts based on these intervals, leading to the formulation I = ∫ from -18 to -9 of s(s^2 - 81) ds minus ∫ from -9 to 1 of s(s^2 - 81) ds. A substitution is made with u = s^2 - 81, simplifying the integral calculations. Ultimately, the evaluated integral results in I = -65449/4, providing the final answer for the definite integral.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
☺'s question at Yahoo! Answers: a definite integral whose integrand has an absolute value factor.

Here is the question:

☺ said:
How to solve ʃ (-18 to 1) [s│81 - s^2 │] ds?

The 81 - s^2 is inside absolute value signs. I don't know how to do this. Can you show me how?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: ☺'s question at Yahoo! Answers: a definite integral whose integrand has an absolute value factor

Hello ☺,

We are given to evaluate:

$$I=\int_{-18}^{1} s\left|81-s^2\right|\,ds$$

First, we should observe that the expression within the absolute value is negative on:

$$(-\infty,-9)\,\cup\,(9,\infty)$$

And so, using the definition of an absolute value, namely:

$$|x|=\begin{cases}x & 0\le x\\ -x & x<0 \\ \end{cases}$$

we may then write:

$$I=\int_{-18}^{-9} s\left(s^2-81\right)\,ds-\int_{-9}^{1}s\left(s^2-81\right)\,ds$$

Using the substitution:

$$u=s^2-81\,\therefore\,du=2s\,ds$$

we obtain:

$$I=\frac{1}{2}\left(\int_{-80}^{0} u\,du-\int_{0}^{3^5}u\,du\right)$$

Applying the FTOC, we get:

$$I=\frac{1}{4}\left(\left[u^2\right]_{-80}^{0}-\left[u^2\right]_{0}^{3^5}\right)$$

$$I=\frac{1}{4}\left(-80^2-9^5\right)=-\frac{65449}{4}$$

Hence, we may conclude:

$$\bbox[10px,border:2px solid #207498]{\int_{-18}^{1} s\left|81-s^2\right|\,ds=-\frac{65449}{4}}$$
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K