Solve Derivative Problem: Lim {P(x+3h)+P(x-3h)-2P(x)}/h^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter lhuyvn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
AI Thread Summary
The limit problem involves evaluating lim {P(x+3h)+P(x-3h)-2P(x)}/h^2 as h approaches 0, where P is a polynomial function. The suggested answer is D) 9P''(x), which can be confirmed using Taylor series expansions for P(x+3h) and P(x-3h). Higher-order terms become negligible as h approaches 0, simplifying the expression. An alternative method involves applying L'Hopital's rule, differentiating the numerator and denominator twice with respect to h. This approach also leads to the conclusion that the limit equals 9P''(x).
lhuyvn
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi members,

Could anyone help me with the problem following?

If x is a real number and P is a polynomial function, then


lim {P(x+3h)+P(x-3h)-2P(x)}/h^2
h->0


A)0
B)6P'(x)
C)3P''(x)
D)9P''(x)
E) 00

I guess D should be the answer, I need an explanation.

Thank You
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The easiest way is to use Taylor-series expansions of the terms P(x+3h), P(x-3h)
to verify your guess.
Then we have, for example:
P(x+3h)=P(x)+P'(x)3h+1/2P''(x)(3h)^2+O(h^3)

O(h^3) is a higher order term, i.e lim h->0 O(h^3)/h^2=0
 
Thank you, arildno

It couldn't be more wonderful solutions.
 
It looks messy, but it's really no different from any other limit problem. What is typically the easiest way to find the limit of 0/0? L'Hopital's rule!

Differentiate top and bottom with respect to h (not x!) twice, using chain rule for top terms. So the first differentiation gives [3P'(x+3h)-3P'(x-3h)]/2h (notice the third term has no h, so drops out). The second round, you get [9P''(x+3h)+9P''(x-3h)]/2. Then setting h=0 gives the desired answer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top