Solve Diffraction Problem: Find Slit Width

  • Thread starter Thread starter percy_07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
To solve the diffraction problem, the distance between the first minima on either side of the screen is 5.4 mm, with the screen positioned 0.9 m from the slit and a wavelength of 546 nm. The first minimum occurs where destructive interference happens, described by the equation sin(θ) = λ/b, where b is the slit width. By constructing a triangle from the slit to the screen, one can determine the angle θ using the geometry of the situation. Once θ is calculated, the slit width can be found by rearranging the equation to b = λ/sin(θ). This approach clarifies the relationship between the slit width and the diffraction pattern observed.
percy_07
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Diffraction...need help bad

Suppose that a single slit diffraction pattern is displayed on a screen. The distance between the first minimum on the left of the screen and the first minimum on the right is 5.4mm. The screen is 0.9m from the slit and the wavlength of light is 546nm. Calculate the width of the slit??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple case of considering the geometry of the situation. The first minimum will occur as ligh has interfered destructively at the first minimum \Theta_1

thus sin \Theta_1=\frac{\lambda} {b}

Where b is the slit width
 
Last edited:
Ok to find theta is a simple case of geometry. Construct a triangle from the slit to the screen and use the values given to determine the angle of the ray. Once calculated you have lambda so the only thing you don't know is b, which will be the sine of theta divided by lambda.
 
could you explain it a little more for me please I am still not grasping it 100%.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top