Solve Eigenvector Equation: Prove Roots are Scalars

  • Thread starter Thread starter student85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvector
student85
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is actually for my general relativity class, but I thought I would get more help in the math section of the forums, since it involves very little physics, or even not at all.

Homework Statement


Take Tab and Sab to be the covariant components of two tensors. Consider the determinant equation for \lambda :

| \lambdaTab - Sab |= 0

Prove that the roots of this equation are scalars, making clear what you mean by scalar.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well If I solve for the determinant I think I should get a quartic equation for the eigenvalues \lambda of the form
\lambda^4 + a1\lambda^3 + a2\lambda^2 + a3\lambda + a4 = 0
Or not? Will I get an equation involving the components of the tensors T and S??
I just want to make sure I am understanding the question and I'm headed in the right path.
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you need to show that the eigenvalues are dependent on T_ab and S_ab in such a way that makes them invariant under transformations to another reference frame. Is that how "scalar" is defined in GR?

There's probably a clever way to answer the question that won't involve writing out the equations in detail.
 
I just don't know where to start. Do you suggest getting the determinant of the matrix and equaling that to 0? That will take so long. Is there some theorem or something? Anybody know? :S
 
Sorry I don't think I know enough to help. I'm only studying special relativity, so I don't know how to interpret this determinant equation.
 
Yeah this is a pretty weird problem. One of my classmates is helping me now :)
Thanks anyway
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top