Solve for Log(base5)36 in Terms of x and y | Logarithms Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter seiferseph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
seiferseph
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
if log2 = x and log3 = y, solve for log(base5)36 in terms of x and y.

how do i even get started on this? I'm really confused with logs.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This seems like a rather roundabout way of doing things. In any case ...

I assume those logarithms are base 10 in which case, by definition of logarithm, we have

10^x = 2
10^y = 3

Let z = \log_5 10 which means 5^z = 10. But

5 = 2 + 3 = 10^x + 10^y

so that

5^z = \left(10^x + 10^y\right)^z = 10

IOW I'm not sure I see the point of the problem!

from which

z \log \left( 10^x + 10^z\right) = \log 10 = 1

and finally

z = \frac {1}{\log \left( 10^x + 10^z \right)}


Of course, a direct approach would have led to

\log_5 10 = \frac {\log 10}{\log_{10} 5} = \frac {1}{\log 5}
 
thanks, but I'm not sure if that is correct (the teacher actually said it was quite simple). the last question was something like a^2 + b^2 for the answer. i'll post a little bit of what i got, I'm not sure if this is right
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 498
Do you realize that your original question is about log_5(10), but the handwritten thing you posted now is about log_5(36)?
 
Muzza said:
Do you realize that your original question is about log_5(10), but the handwritten thing you posted now is about log_5(36)?

now i do :blushing: its supposed to be log_5(36)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top