MHB Solve for x in the denominator of the fraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
AI Thread Summary
To solve for x in the equation 7/x = 14, the correct approach involves dividing both sides by 7, resulting in 1/x = 2. Inverting both sides gives x = 1/2. Cross-multiplication is not applicable here since the operation involves addition rather than a fraction comparison. The main solution steps have been clarified, confirming that x equals 1/2 is indeed correct. Understanding the distinction between cross-multiplication and making denominators equal is essential for solving similar problems.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
View attachment 5788

In this I think you should cross multiply ; I got 1/2 by doing so and I am not sure whether it is correct.Can you help me to solve this and be kind enough to explain your steps a little. :)
 

Attachments

  • Capturefrac.PNG
    Capturefrac.PNG
    710 bytes · Views: 111
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Combine terms on the left:

$$\frac{7}{x}=14$$

Divide through by 7:

$$\frac{1}{x}=2$$

Invert both sides:

$$x=\frac{1}{2}$$ :)
 
Many Thanks. :)
 
mathlearn said:
In this I think you should cross multiply ; I got 1/2 by doing so and I am not sure whether it is correct.Can you help me to solve this and be kind enough to explain your steps a little. :)

We cross-multiply when we replace the division symbol with multiplication symbol.

In this case we have addition, where we make denominators equal (and do not cross-multiply).

Main help is already provided by MarkFL.
 
Many Thanks (Smile)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top