Solve Fourier Transform Problem: f(t)=e^(-t^2/a^2)

AI Thread Summary
To solve the Fourier transform of f(t)=e^(-t^2/a^2), the integral F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of f(t)e^(i*w*t)dt is rewritten using properties of exponential functions. Completing the square in the exponent allows for the application of the Gaussian integral formula, leading to the substitution u=t/a. This substitution simplifies the expression to a form suitable for the Gaussian integral, ultimately yielding F(w)=sqrt(pi)*a*e^(-a^2*w^2/4). The solution matches the answer provided in the textbook, demonstrating the effectiveness of these mathematical techniques.
RyanA1084
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I had this problem for homework and it stumped me. It's too late to get points for it, but I'd like to know for future reference.

Find the Fourier transform F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of f(t)e^(i*w*t)dt

f(t)=e^(-t^2/a^2)

i=sqrt(-1) w=omega=constant a=constant

This looks sort of like a gaussian integral:

integral of e^(-a*x^2)dx=sqrt(pi/a)

but I couldn't see how to do it...

The answer given by the book is sqrt(pi)ae^(-a^2*w^2/4)

Anyone know how to do this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the thing you want to do here is complete the square in the arguements of the exponential. In this expression:
-t^2/a^2 + iwt = -(t-b)^2 +c.
where you can find b and c. When you've done that you can change variables and you will have and expression for the Gaussian that you are familiar with.
 




To solve this problem, you can use the definition of the Fourier transform, which is F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of f(t)e^(i*w*t)dt. In this case, f(t)=e^(-t^2/a^2), so we can rewrite the integral as F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-t^2/a^2)e^(i*w*t)dt.

Next, we can use the property of exponential functions that e^(a+b)=e^a*e^b. In this case, a=-t^2/a^2 and b=i*w*t. So we can rewrite the integral as F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-t^2/a^2+i*w*t)dt.

Now, we can use the Gaussian integral formula mentioned in the post, which is integral of e^(-a*x^2)dx=sqrt(pi/a). In our case, a=-1/a^2, so we can rewrite the integral as F(w)=integral from -infinity to infinity of sqrt(pi/a^2)e^(-(-1/a^2)t^2+i*w*t)dt.

Next, we can factor out the constant sqrt(pi/a^2) and use the definition of the Fourier transform again. This will give us F(w)=sqrt(pi/a^2)integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-(1/a^2)t^2+i*w*t)dt.

Now, we can use the substitution u=t/a, which will give us du=1/a dt. We can also rewrite the exponential term as e^(-(1/a^2)t^2+i*w*t)=e^(-(u^2-2iu*w))=e^(-(u-i*w)^2). This will give us F(w)=sqrt(pi/a^2)integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-(u-i*w)^2)du.

Using the Gaussian integral formula again, we can rewrite the integral as F(w)=sqrt(pi/a^2)*sqrt(pi)*a*e^(-a^2*w^2/4). Simplifying this, we get F(w)=sqrt(pi)*a*e^(-a^2*w^2/4), which is the same answer given by the book.

In summary, to solve this Fourier transform problem, we used the definition of the Fourier transform, the property of exponential functions,
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top