Solve Fusion Energy Equation: High School Physics Errors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kemilss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Fusion
Kemilss
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm taking high school physics, and I've had problems in the past with flat out errors in my textbook (I've brought them up here). It's incredibly frustrating when your trying to understand something.

Anyways, I need to know which is right:

The text in my book goes through to explain,

energy released = (Eb(f) - Eb(i))C^2

or Change in E=(Mf - Mi)C^2

Fine. This gives me a negative answer, which has already given me headaches, but these turned into a eureka moment for me when I realized this was "less energy" required to be stable, or binding energy.

So now, the textbook goes on to do more then 1 example, and in all of them it's,

energy released = (Eb(i) - Eb(f))C^2

or Change in E=(Mi - Mf).

These give different answers. This website say's

http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Nuclear/Energy_of_Nuclear_Change.htm

and Physics forums has this example

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=241916

Both contradict each other, or am I wrong?!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I won't comment on your specific examples, since I don't know what they are referring to. However in any (nuclear) reaction where there is a mass difference, the difference ends up as energy with E = mc2. If the reaction involves a loss of mass, the energy is positive. If the reaction has a gain in mass, it means energy has to be supplied to make it happen.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The definition of binding energy can be confusing, as binding energy is a positive value, but a larger binding energy means the nucleus has less energy.

The first set of equations is right apart from the factor of c^2 in the first line.
 
hmm, I'm still a little confused. Here's an example straight out of my book.

"Calculate the energy released when three Helium-4 nuclei combine to form a carbon-12 nucleus"

Book example follows the principle (mi-mf)

or: (3*4.002603u - 12u) = 0.007809u

However, when it is explaining the process, it explains that (mf - mi) = (change in)E

or: (12u - 3*4.002603u) = -.007809u
 
Those are the actual nuclei masses, not the binding energies.

A larger mass corresponds to a smaller binding energy, so there you have to take the opposite difference.

See mathman, calculate the mass before and after the reaction, that is the easiest way to see what happens.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top