Solve Inductance for 550nm EM Waves w/17pF Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter z_sharp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inductance
AI Thread Summary
To determine the required inductance for a 17 pF capacitor in an oscillator generating 550 nm electromagnetic waves, the formula f = 1/(2π√(LC)) was rearranged to isolate L. The calculations show that L equals approximately 5.0 x 10^-21 H, which is an extremely small value. The prefix 'p' in 17 pF stands for pico, equivalent to 10^(-12). While the algebra appears correct, the physical implications of such a small inductance may warrant further discussion. Overall, the calculations and understanding of the components involved seem accurate.
z_sharp
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I've managed to solve the following question but the answer I'm getting doesn't seem right...

What inductance must be connected to a 17 pF capacitor in an oscillator capable of generating 550 nm (i.e. visible) electromagnetic waves? Comment on your answer.

To solve it I just rearranged the following equation and isolated L

f=\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{LC}}

I'm also not sure what the prefix 'p' in the 17pF stands for...

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
p stands for pico, which is equivalent to 10^(-12).
 
So this is what I have now, the answer I'm getting is extremely small, could someone please just check over my work to see if I have made any errors... Thanks

<br /> \begin{gather*}<br /> C=17pF=1.7\times10^{-11}F\\<br /> \lambda=550nm=5.5\times10^{-7}m\\<br /> c=3.0\times10^8m/s<br /> \end{gather8}<br />

<br /> \begin{gather*}<br /> f=\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{LC}\\<br /> \frac{c}{\lambda}\sqrt{LC}=\frac{1}{2\pi}}\\<br /> LC=(\frac{\lambda}{2c\pi})^2\\<br /> L=(\frac{\lambda}{2c\pi})^{2}(\frac{1}{C})\\<br /> L=5.0\times10^{-21}\\<br /> \end{gather*}<br />
 
Your algebra looks right to me. I don't remember much about inductance to comment on the physics of it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top