Solve Inequalities algebraically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panphobia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality algebraically, the critical values of the function must be identified, specifically where the expression becomes zero or undefined. The intervals determined are (-∞, -3/2), (-3/2, 4/3), (4/3, 2), and (2, ∞). The product of the two factors, 3r - 4 and the cube root of r - 2, must be analyzed to find when they yield a negative result, leading to two cases based on their signs. The valid solution set is found to be 4/3 < r < 3, confirming that the inequality holds true within this range. Thus, the algebraic proof aligns with the identified intervals and critical points.
Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


153wehw.png





The Attempt at a Solution


So when I started this question, I knew that 2r +3 > 0 in order for this whole thing to work so r > -3/2, and I know that if the middle term has to be more than 0, than only one more of the others is going to be negative, for the first term i found that r < 4/3 and the third was r < 2, so I know that the answer should be (4/3, 2), but how do I prove that algebraically?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Panphobia said:
So when I started this question, I knew that 2r +3 > 0 in order for this whole thing to work so r > -3/2, and I know that if the middle term has to be more than 0, than only one more of the others is going to be negative, for the first term i found that r < 4/3 and the third was r < 2, so I know that the answer should be (4/3, 2), but how do I prove that algebraically?
I wouldn't solve it "algebraically." I would solve it by making a two-column table. First, find values of r that would make the left side 0 or undefined (I call these critical values), which appears you have already done. Then in the first column list all critical values and all intervals bounded by these critical values.
Code:
Test interval|Value
-------------+----------
(-inf, -3/2) |undefined
r = -3/2     |0
(-3/2, 4/3)  |
r = 4/3      |0
(4/3, 2)     |
r = 2        |0
(2, inf)     |
In the second column, you fill in 0, undefined, positive, or negative. For the remaining intervals, pick a test value to plug into the inequality and you will eventually determine the solution set.
 
ohhhh ok, that makes sense. thank you.
 
Since the square root, \sqrt{2r+ 3}, is, by definition, nonnegative, you can (almost) ignore it. The product of the two numbers, 3r- 4 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}, will be negative if and only if the two factors are of opposite order. In other words, either

1) 3r- 4> 0 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}&lt; 0 or
2) 3r- 4< 0 and \sqrt[3]{r- 2}&gt; 0

Similarly, a positive number, cubed, is positive and a negative number, cubed, is negative. So that can be reduced to
1) 3r- 4> 0 and r- 2< 0 or
2) 3r- 4< 0 and r- 2> 0.

3r- 4> 0 for r> 4/3 and r- 2< 0 for r< 3. Those will both be true for 4/3< r< 3.
\sqrt{2r+ 3}= 0 only for r= -3/2 and that does not lie between 4/3 and 3.

(1) is true for 4/3< r< 3.

3r- r< 0 for r< 4/3 and r- 2> 0 for r> 3. (2) is never true.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top