Solve Lagrange Interpolation Problem with Pen Position Detection

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nihi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpolation Lagrange
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Lagrange Interpolation Problem in a digitizer that detects pen position through antenna energy measurements. The user encounters issues when the pen is positioned between two antennae, resulting in similar energy values that hinder accurate position detection. Suggestions include exploring spline methods for improved curve control, as Lagrange interpolation lacks adaptability outside interpolation points. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more refined approach to enhance the accuracy of pen position detection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange interpolation algorithm
  • Familiarity with spline interpolation techniques
  • Knowledge of pen position detection using antenna energy measurements
  • Basic programming skills for implementing interpolation algorithms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research spline interpolation methods for enhanced curve fitting
  • Explore NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines) for complex curve control
  • Investigate techniques for adjusting interpolation sensitivity in Lagrange methods
  • Learn about energy measurement optimization in digitizer technology
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and developers working on digitizer technology, researchers in interpolation methods, and anyone involved in improving pen position detection accuracy.

Nihi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I am facing a problem and I hope that you can give me a hand. Here I describe the situation

I am working on a digitizer that can detect the pen position by measuring the antennae energy that are placed in a grid fashion. To get the x coordinate of the pen I measure the energy of three antennae where the pen is supposed to be and then I interpolate this 3 energy-value with Lagrange algorithm.
Finally I determine the pen coordinate by finding the highest f(x) of the curve using a loop.

With Lagrange method it approximates pretty well the actual relationship position-energy but it's not linear.

So here is the problem: when the pen is in the middle of two antennae I get 2 similar energy value whereas the 3rd is lower then these latter, so the highest point of the curve remains about the same when I move the pen around the middle position of 2 antennae. The result is that when the pen crosses these middle points it moves slowly because there is not much changes in the curve which is limited by these 2 similar energy-value.

Is it possible to introduce a factor that changes the curve making it more narrow at the highest point? it's just a thought, I appreciate any solution.

Xcoordinate_Table_M.jpg


In the picture you can see the measurement and the coordinate calculated through Lagrange algorithm. I hope that someone can help me. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Nihi.

Have you ever heard of splines before?
 
chiro said:
Hey Nihi.

Have you ever heard of splines before?

Thank you Chiro.
Yes I had. I want to remain with Lagrange and see if I can improve the current result but I will try Spline to see if get better.
 
Lagrange just fits the curve without any sort of information on how it changes (even though they still interpolate between the points).

Splines and more complex structures (like NURBS) allow fine-grained control on what happens outside of the interpolation points.

It's a lot more complex but it gives you those extra options in what happens to the curve.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K