Solve Laplace Eq. in 1D: Head & Darcy Vel.

Jgoshorn1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the Laplace equation in one dimension (x, i.e. (∂^2h)/(∂x^2)= 0)
Boundary conditions are as follows:
h= 1m @ x=0m
h= 13m @ x=10m
For 0≤x≤5 K1= 6ms^-1
For 5≤x≤10 K2 = 3ms^-1

What is the head at x = 3, x = 5, and x = 8?

What is the Darcy velocity (specific discharge)?


NOTE: There are multiple steps that will need to be done. Realize that system is heterogeneous. In a multiple layer system with steady-state conditions, Darcy velocity in one layer must equal the Darcy velocity in the other layers

Homework Equations



h(x) = ho - [(h0 - hD )/D]*x

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to use the equation above subbing in 3, 5, and 8 for the x and using 10m as D, 1m as h0, and 13m for hD

Then I used the specific specific discharge for the Darcy's velocity (q=K(dh/dL))

That was apparently all wrong. Apparently this needs to be broken into 2 systems, coupled. Each individual system can be treated as homogenous. So it need two separate LaPlace equations? I really don't know what to do with this problem, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the discharge goes through both portions of the domain, you have continuity of the dependent variable h at the interface. In addition you also have continuity of discharge at the interface.

When you integrate the Laplace equation in 1-D, you have two constants of integration for each section of the domain. The matchings of discharge and h serve to eliminate some of the integration constants.
 
So, what I've done is set q(in) = q(out) => -K1(dh/dl)=K2(dh/dl) => 6((h-1)/5) = 3((13-h)/5) => h(@x=5) = 5m

Then I set the used set of boundary Conditions (BC) to interpret the solution to LaPlace in 1D (h=cx+D):
For BC @ x=0 and h=1 =>1=c(0)+D => 1=D
For BC @ x=5 and h=5 => 5=c(5)+1 => c=4/5
the I used h=cx+D again to solve for the head at x=3
=>h(@x=3)=(4/5)(3)+1=3.4

For the second system I used the point slope eq (y1-y)=m(x1-x) to get c
=> (5-13)/(5-10) = m = 8/5 = c
Then I used h=cx+D to solve for D
=> 5=(8/5)(5) + D => D=-3
Then to solve for h at x=8
h=cx+D => h(@x=8) => (8/5)(8)-3 = 9.8To get Darcy's velocity I just used q=K(dh/dl) for each system
System 1 = 6(4/5) = 4.8 = q
System 2 = 4(8/5) = 4.8 = q

Yes?
 
I get the same answers as you but went about the problem a little differently.

I solve the ODE over two separate domains:

h1(x)=c1+c2*x
h2(x)=c3+c4*x

I used the Dirichlet boundary conditions along with continuity of head and continuity of Darcy velocity to solve for the 4 constants of integration. Equations worked out to be:

h(x) = 1 + .8x 0<x<5

h(x) = -3 + 1.6x 5<x<10

The < signs should be weak inequalities. I cannot make them on my computer.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top