Solve Linear Inequality: ABS Value(7x-8) <=4x+7

CanaBra
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Linear inequalities!

I need help solving the following inequality:
ABS value(7x-8) <=4x+7

+/-(7x-8) <=4x+7
7x-8 <=4x+7 -(7x-8) <=4x+7
7x-8-4x <=4x+7-4x -7x+8 <=4x+7
3x-8<=7 -7x+8-4x <=4x+7-4x
3x-8+8<=7+8 -7x-4x+8<=7
3x/3 >= 15 -11x+8<=7-8
x>=5 -11x/-11 >= -1/-11
x>=1/11

Can anyone tell me if this is right?
Also, I don't understand how to write the solution set.
Is this right? 1/11>=x>=5?
Help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Hmm, my answer has reversed inequalities.

|7x-8| ≤ 4x+7

7x-8 ≤ 4x+7
3x ≤ 15
x ≤ 5

-(7x-8) ≤ 4x+7
-7x+8 ≤ 4x+7
1 ≤ 11x
1/11 ≤ x

So combining the two inequalities:

1/11 ≤ x ≤ 5

EDIT: Your routine to find x >= 1/11 is fine; however, you reversed an inequality in finding x <= 5 when dividing by 3. The inequality will only be reversed if you multiply or divide by a negative number.
 
Last edited:


Thank you very much, I understand now.
 


pbandjay said:
Hmm, my answer has reversed inequalities.

|7x-8| ≤ 4x+7

7x-8 ≤ 4x+7
3x ≤ 15
x ≤ 5

-(7x-8) ≤ 4x+7
-7x+8 ≤ 4x+7
1 ≤ 11x
1/11 ≤ x

So combining the two inequalities:

1/11 ≤ x ≤ 5

EDIT: Your routine to find x >= 1/11 is fine; however, you reversed an inequality in finding x <= 5 when dividing by 3. The inequality will only be reversed if you multiply or divide by a negative number.

Your answer happens to be correct, but I think you need to be a bit more careful with your method here.

Your first case is when 7x-8 is nonnegative which implies x >= 8/7:
|7x-8| ≤ 4x+7

7x-8 ≤ 4x+7
3x ≤ 15
x ≤ 5

That isn't the correct solution for this case. You should have:
8/7 ≤ x ≤ 5

Now your second case is when 7x - 8 is negative, so x ≤ 8/7:
-(7x-8) ≤ 4x+7
-7x+8 ≤ 4x+7
1 ≤ 11x
1/11 ≤ x

Again, that isn't correct. It should be 1/11 ≤ x ≤ 8/7

The union of these two solution sets gives the correct answer. You don't combine your two inequalities. You take the union of the solution sets which, for your sets, would have given the wrong answer.
 


Yes I understand now. Thank you for helping.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top