Solve Link Budget: EIRP 100000 W, -75 dBm Receiver Sensitivity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the required gain of a receiving antenna for a satellite signal with an EIRP of 100,000 W and a receiver sensitivity of -75 dBm. The original poster converted the receiver sensitivity to watts and calculated the free space gain, arriving at a final gain requirement of 40.56 dB for the receiving antenna. However, there was confusion regarding the calculations, particularly the free space loss and the necessary gain to meet the receiver's minimum sensitivity. Another user suggested converting all values to dB for easier calculations and provided an alternative method, concluding that a gain of approximately 41.2 dBi is needed. The thread emphasizes the importance of careful unit conversion and verification in link budget calculations.
ENGRstudent
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I think I've done this right, but I'm looking for some reassurance because I often make stupid mistakes when converting from dB to watts and back again.

Thank you in advance! I'm about to graduate in 2 weeks, and this forum has been AWESOME throughout my college career. Kudos to everyone who takes the time to help out.

The problem statement reads:
"A satellite in synchronous orbit outputs a 4 GHz signal with an EIRP of 100000 W. If the ground based receiver has a sensitivity of -75 dBm, what is the gain required of the receiving antenna?"

My equations:
(P_receiver) = (EIRP) x (G_free space) x (G_receiving antenna)

(G_free space) = [λ/(4*pi*d)]^2

P_receiver = receiving antenna power
G_free space = free space gain
G_receiving antenna = receiving antenna gain
λ = c/f
d = 35,800,000 meters (height of orbit for geosynchronous satellite courtesy of Wiki)

Converting receiver sensitivity to Watts:

-75 dBm = 30 + 10 * log[(P_receiver)] ==> P_receiver = 3.16 x 10^-11 W

Solving for G_free space:

(G_free space) = [(3.0 x 10^8)/(4 x 10^9)]/[(4*pi*35,800,000)]^2
= 2.78 x 10^-20

Solving for G_receiving antenna:

(G_receiving antenna) = (P_receiver)/[(EIRP)*(G_free space)]
(G_receiving antenna) = (3.16 x 10^-11)/[(100000)(2.78 x 10^-20)]
= 11367
= 10 * log(11367) = 40.56 dB

So my final answer is 40.56 dB. Yes? No? Maybe?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
i get -128.5dBm without an antenna on the ground, thing is I'm stumped on how to calculate needed gain for the antenna.

so i just added the arrl antenna book to my wish list, hopefully this should be covered.

edit: shouldn't it be -75-(-128.5)=53.5dB of gain to meet the receiver minimum? :blushing:
 
Last edited:
Thanks for taking the time to look over the problem. Where did you get -128.5 from?

I just worked it again and found an error in my last step, and the new value I got for the gain is 40.56 dB.

I have attached my work as a PDF to make it more clear. Please review it to see where I may have made a mistake?

Thanks again!

EDIT: I made a mistake in my correction, 40.56 dB is still my final answer.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
the equations are a little different in my book, they want a ratio for both antenna gains which i left at 1.

Pr=Pt*Gt*Gr*λ^2/16*pi^2*d^2
 
Don't know if its too late to answer this but here it goes. 1st convert everything to dB, adding and subtracting is way easier then multiplying and dividing. So 100000 Watts EIRP = 80 dBm. Free space loss of 4 GHz at 35,800 Km is 196.2 db. So 80 - 196.2 = -116.2 dbm. Your receiver needs -75 so you need a -75 - -116.2 = 41.2 dBi antenna. (dBi because transmit power was in EIRP)

Equations:
Free space loss in dB: P(dBm) = 32.43 + 20LogD(km) + 20LogF(MHz)
watts to dbm: dBm = (10 log (power watts)) + 30
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Back
Top