Solve Physics Problem: Convert MPH to MPS

  • Thread starter Thread starter AegisFang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert miles per hour (mph) to meters per second (mps), start by recognizing that 1 mile is approximately 1.60934 kilometers, and 1 kilometer equals 1,000 meters. Therefore, to convert 40 mph to mps, first convert miles to kilometers, resulting in 40 mph being approximately 64.37 km/h. Then, convert kilometers per hour to meters per second by dividing by 3.6, yielding about 17.78 m/s. The final conversion shows that 40 mph is equivalent to approximately 17.78 m/s. Understanding this conversion is essential for solving related physics problems.
AegisFang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It actually applies to helping me in Physics but its math related. I can't for the life of me for some odd reason, remember how to use the monorail method so convert something such as 40mph into meters per second. Where the hell do I start?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
miles/hour = 1.6km/hour = 16000m/hour = 16000m/60minutes = 16000m/3600 s
= 4.44 m/s
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top