Solve Physics Problem: Max Force & Height for Bone Fracture

  • Thread starter Thread starter alonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem related to bone fracture due to applied force and jump height. Young's modulus for bone is provided, along with the maximum allowable strain before fracture. To find the maximum force, users are advised to use the relationship between stress, strain, and Young's modulus, plugging in the given values. For the maximum jump height, suggestions include applying Newton's second law and conservation of energy principles. The conversation emphasizes the need to show work for better assistance while guiding the user toward the correct approach to the problem.
alonzo
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Physics problem - please help!

I have absolutely no idea wat this question is talking about.
Young’s modulus for bone is about 1.4 x 10E10 Pa, and bone can only undergo a 1.0% decrease in length before fracturing, so
(a) What is the maximum force that can be applied to a bone whose minimum cross – sectional area is 3.0 cm², without fracturing? (This is the approximate area of the tibia at its narrowest).
(b) What is the maximum height from which a 75kg person could jump without fracturing the tibia? Assume that stress is the same in both legs, and that the time between first touching the floor and coming to rest is 0.035s.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually we need you to post your work on a problem before we help out.

However, I think I might be able to steer you in the right direction.

Remember that Young Modulus is defined (one dimensionally) as :

Y (or E) = stress/strain

Where stress is Force/Area(cross sectional)

and strain is (change in length)/(original length)

For part a you are given all of these but the force.
All you need to do is plug your values in.
 
As a suggestion you can use Newton's 2nd Law and Conservation of Energy to get the height for part b. Do you know what the answer should be?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top