MHB Solve R Root with Newton's Method: n ≥2, R>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter house2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Newtons
Click For Summary
Using Newton's method for the functions \(f(x) = 1 - \frac{R}{x^n}\) and \(g(x) = x^n - R\) yields two distinct iterative formulas for calculating \(R^{1/n}\). The first iteration formula simplifies to \(x_{k+1} = x_k - \frac{(x_k^n - R)x_k}{Rn}\). The second iteration results in \(x_{k+1} = x_k - \frac{x_k(x_k^n - R)}{-nR}\). Both methods converge to the same root, but they differ in their formulations and convergence behavior. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively applying Newton's method in this context.
house2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, need some help with this question. I am stuck and don't know what to do.

Q: Show that using Newton's method to $$1-\frac{R}{x^n}$$ and to $$x^n-R$$ for determining $$(R)^{\frac{1}{n}}$$ results in 2 similar, but different iterative formulas, with $$n \ge 2$$ and $$R >0$$

Thanks for your help guys!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First the wording of this question makes it very difficult to understand what is required. I will assume that you are asked to use Newton's method with:

\[f(x)=1-\frac{R}{x^n}\]

to find \(R^{1/n}\).

First applying Newton's method to \(f(x)\) if it works finds a solution to \(f(x)=0\).

Putting \(f(x)=1-\frac{R}{x^n}=0\) rearranges to \(\frac{R}{x^n}=1\) or \(x^n=R\) so \(f(x)\) is of the correct form for finding \(R^{1/n}\).

Now Newton's iteration to find a root of \(f(x)=0\) is:

\[x_{k+1}=x_k-\frac{f(x_k)}{f'(x_k)}\]
which in this case reduces to:

\[x_{k+1}=x_k-\frac{(x_k^n-R)x_k}{Rn}\]

Now the question as asked does not indicate where to go from here.

CB
 
Last edited:
the itirating
\[ x_{i+1} = x_i - \frac{f(x_i)}{f'(x_i)} \]

for first one

\[ x_1 = x_0 - \frac{((x_0)^n - R)}{n(x_0 ^{n-1})} \]

second one

\[ x_1 = x_0 - \frac{1 - \frac{R}{x_0 ^{n}} }{ \frac{-nR}{x_0 ^{n+1}}}= x_0 - \frac{x_0(x_0 ^n-R)}{-nR} \]

these are different
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
551
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
848
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K