Solve RC Integrator Circuit Problem | Romania Student

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmzi123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Rc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving an RC integrator circuit problem involving a capacitor (C=150 nanofarads) and a resistor (R=1000 ohms) with a frequency of 10 kHz. The student is tasked with determining the output voltage (V2) based on an input voltage (V1) defined as V1 = cos(ωt), where ω = 2π * 10000. Key insights include the approximation V2 ≈ (1/RC) ∫ V1 dt, and the importance of understanding the relationship between R, C, and the frequency to justify the approximation used in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuit theory
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of sinusoidal functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of frequency domain analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the output voltage V2 in RC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of the approximation in circuit analysis
  • Explore frequency domain analysis techniques for RC circuits
  • Investigate the impact of varying frequency on circuit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, particularly those studying circuit analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of RC integrator problems and their solutions.

hmzi123
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
RC integrator circuit
Relevant Equations
RC integrator circuits
1.png

Hello, i am student from Romania ( first year) and my physics teacher told us to solve this problem. We know that C=150 nanofarad, R= 1000 ohms, and the frequency we should take is more then 1061 ( 10kHz, to be more exactly). My problem is that i don't know what to take as V1 ( i took it coswt, where w=2*pi*10000), can you help me understand how to choose the V1, and what its formula is so that I can calculate and find V2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello hm, :welcome: !

hmzi123 said:
told us to solve this problem
Did you forget to mention the 'problem'? I don't see what is asked !
 
BvU said:
Hello hm, :welcome: !

Did you forget to mention the 'problem'? I don't see what is asked !
The value of V2. Sorry!
 
No need to apologize. Can you render the complete problem statement ? Asking for V2 when nothing is given for V1 is weird. The picture does not help much either. The only thing I can suppose is that you are asked to derive ##V_2\; {\bf \approx}\; \displaystyle {1\over RC}\int V_1 dt\quad ## i.e. show what is small enough to be ignored wrt what else.
 
BvU said:
No need to apologize. Can you render the complete problem statement ? Asking for V2 when nothing is given for V1 is weird. The picture does not help much either. The only thing I can suppose is that you are asked to derive ##V_2\; {\bf \approx}\; \displaystyle {1\over RC}\int V_1 dt\quad ## i.e. show what is small enough to be ignored wrt what else.
I took v1 as coswt where w is the 2*pi*frequency ( in this case the teacher said to pick the frequency 10000). Is this correct as a formula for v1 or not?
 
It satisfies ##R >> {1\over \omega C}##, so yes.

[edit] actually more ##R > {1\over \omega C}## but you can calculate that for yourself, can't you.

Can you find out why it says ##\ \approx\ ## and not ##\ =\ ## ?
 
BvU said:
Can you find out why it says ##\ \approx\ ## and not ##\ =\ ## ?
It should be ##\approx## there and the line above it (if I'm seeing that tiny font correct) because ##i \neq V_1/R##. They're omitting the small impedance from the capacitor, which is being dominated by a much larger ##R##.

Another question is why not solve this in frequency domain? Has that been covered in the class?
 
1.jpg

After solving this is what i got. I know i should calculate v2 max value so where i wrote sin(2pi*10000t) i thought that the max value of any sin is 1 so that means the fraction will be 1/(2*pi*10000). Did i solve this any good?
 
Joshy said:
It should be ##\approx## there and the line above it (if I'm seeing that tiny font correct) because ##i \neq V_1/R##
Correct, but you are giving away the "why" -- and that is what I think the exercise wants Hm to find out.
hmzi123 said:
After solving

1590743731166.png

No, not exactly. Work out the correct expression and then apply the approximation.
 

Attachments

  • 1590743829435.png
    1590743829435.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 189

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K