Solve Retardation Problem: 25m from Traffic Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter takando12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Retardation
AI Thread Summary
A driver applies brakes at 400 m from a traffic light while traveling at 15 m/s with a retardation of 0.3 m/s². Calculating the time to stop reveals it takes 50 seconds, during which the vehicle travels 375 m, leaving 25 m from the light. However, using a 60-second timeframe incorrectly suggests a distance of 360 m, resulting in 40 m from the light. The confusion arises from misapplying the equations, as the model should account for the vehicle stopping and then maintaining a speed of zero, rather than reversing. Proper modeling clarifies that the vehicle does not continue moving after stopping.
takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A driver applies brakes on seeing a traffic signal 400 m ahead. At the time of applying brakes the vehicle was moving with 15m/s and retarding with 0.3m/s2. The distance of the vehicle after 1 min from the traffic light is?
A) 25m B) 375m C) 360m D) 40m

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Using v=u+at I found the time that the car takes to come v=0 is 50 sec. And using s=ut+1/2at2 I found the distance it traveled in 50 sec is 375m . Hence distance from the traffic light is 25m.
The same problem , this time using s=ut+1/2at2 and t=60 secs (this is what i did first) , i got s= 360m and distance from traffic light =40m. Why exactly is this not working? Is the reason that the equation gives me this answer is that the equation assumes that the car is going to stop at t=50 sec and then continue speeding up in the opposite direction? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
Is the reason that the equation gives me this answer is that the equation assumes that the car is going to stop at t=50 sec and then continue speeding up in the opposite direction? Please help.
Yes, exactly.

You are expected to model the situation of a person driving up to a stop light. (People don't reverse at stop lights).

Your model was: acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s

But the better model is: For time 0<t<T acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s; for time t>T acceleration = 0 (where T is the time to come to a stop).
 
  • Like
Likes takando12
Nathanael said:
Yes, exactly.

You are expected to model the situation of a person driving up to a stop light. (People don't reverse at stop lights).

Your model was: acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s

But the better model is: For time 0<t<T acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s; for time t>T acceleration = 0 (where T is the time to come to a stop).

thank you sir,
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top