Solve Retardation Problem: 25m from Traffic Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter takando12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Retardation
Click For Summary
A driver applies brakes at 400 m from a traffic light while traveling at 15 m/s with a retardation of 0.3 m/s². Calculating the time to stop reveals it takes 50 seconds, during which the vehicle travels 375 m, leaving 25 m from the light. However, using a 60-second timeframe incorrectly suggests a distance of 360 m, resulting in 40 m from the light. The confusion arises from misapplying the equations, as the model should account for the vehicle stopping and then maintaining a speed of zero, rather than reversing. Proper modeling clarifies that the vehicle does not continue moving after stopping.
takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A driver applies brakes on seeing a traffic signal 400 m ahead. At the time of applying brakes the vehicle was moving with 15m/s and retarding with 0.3m/s2. The distance of the vehicle after 1 min from the traffic light is?
A) 25m B) 375m C) 360m D) 40m

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Using v=u+at I found the time that the car takes to come v=0 is 50 sec. And using s=ut+1/2at2 I found the distance it traveled in 50 sec is 375m . Hence distance from the traffic light is 25m.
The same problem , this time using s=ut+1/2at2 and t=60 secs (this is what i did first) , i got s= 360m and distance from traffic light =40m. Why exactly is this not working? Is the reason that the equation gives me this answer is that the equation assumes that the car is going to stop at t=50 sec and then continue speeding up in the opposite direction? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
Is the reason that the equation gives me this answer is that the equation assumes that the car is going to stop at t=50 sec and then continue speeding up in the opposite direction? Please help.
Yes, exactly.

You are expected to model the situation of a person driving up to a stop light. (People don't reverse at stop lights).

Your model was: acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s

But the better model is: For time 0<t<T acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s; for time t>T acceleration = 0 (where T is the time to come to a stop).
 
  • Like
Likes takando12
Nathanael said:
Yes, exactly.

You are expected to model the situation of a person driving up to a stop light. (People don't reverse at stop lights).

Your model was: acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s

But the better model is: For time 0<t<T acceleration = -0.3 m/s/s; for time t>T acceleration = 0 (where T is the time to come to a stop).

thank you sir,
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K