Solve Timelike Geodesic: Find A & B for Curve

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



The question is to find ##A## and ##B## such that the specified curve (we are given a certain parameterisation , see below) is a timelike geodesic , where we have ##|s| < 1 ##

I am just stuck on the last bit really.

So since the geodesic is affinely paramterised ##dL/ds=0## and so I can set ##L=constant##, ##L ## the Lagrangian of a freely-falling particle.

Let ## L ## be this constant.

And with the specified metric and parameterised curve, which are all given to us, this gives:

##B^2(\frac{A^2-s^2}{1-s^2}) = L ##

This is all fine.

MY QUESTION IS...

2. Homework Equations


see above

The Attempt at a Solution



MY QUESTION IS...

From this I conclude that (since a null curve is given by ##L=0##, a space-like by ## L < 0 ## and a time-like by ##L>0##, since the metric signature in the question is ( +, - ) ) that we require ##|A|<1## since we have ##|s| < 1 ## , and ##B\neq 0 ##, however the solution gives:

we need ##A=\pm 1 ## and ##B\neq 0 ##.
I don't understand where ##A=\pm 1 ## comes from, I thought we just need it such that ##L > 0## and ##A=\pm 1 ## does this

Many thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not given us the full problem. You have forgotten to specify the given curve and metric.
 
Orodruin said:
You have not given us the full problem. You have forgotten to specify the given curve and metric.

I know, I am pretty sure theyre not needed, it is just the final conclusion described above that I am stuck on. but I will post them now.

curve ## t= A tanh^{-1} s ## , ##x=B(1-s^{2})^{1/2}##
metric : ##ds^2=x^2 dt^2 - dx^2 ##
 
Last edited:
Did you try inserting the curve into the geodesic equations for the given metric?
 
Orodruin said:
Did you try inserting the curve into the geodesic equations for the given metric?

the question was completed using the euler-lagrange equations. One replaced with setting ##L## to a constant as above, the other the E-L equation for ##t## which gave no new constraints on ##A## and ##B## .

It is just the conclusion as I say in OP that I am on stuck on.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top