Solve Word Problem: 2006 Taxes Based on 33% Bracket

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
AI Thread Summary
Karen's 2005 tax calculation was based on a formula that applied a 22% tax rate after a standard deduction of $6,500. For 2006, she is assumed to be in a 33% tax bracket, leading to confusion over the correct formula for her taxes. The suggested book answer includes a multiplier of 1.25, which is unclear without additional context about her income increase. The discussion highlights that being in a higher tax bracket means only part of her income is taxed at that higher rate, and the cutoff between brackets is not provided. Overall, the conversation points to potential errors in the textbook and the need for clarity in tax calculations.
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
Every year in the US each working American typically pays in taxes a percentage of his or her earnings (minus the stand deuction). Karen's 2005 taxes were calculated based on the formula T(x)= .22(x-6500). That year the standard deduction was $6,500 & her tax bracket paid 22%. Write the function that will determine her 2006 taxes assuming she receives a raise that places her in a 33% braket.

So I wrote at .33(x-6,500). Seemed simply enough, but I guess maybe it was too simple. The book answer is .33(1.25x-6,500). What I don't understand is where the 1.25 came from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuahji said:
Every year in the US each working American typically pays in taxes a percentage of his or her earnings (minus the stand deuction). Karen's 2005 taxes were calculated based on the formula T(x)= .22(x-6500). That year the standard deduction was $6,500 & her tax bracket paid 22%. Write the function that will determine her 2006 taxes assuming she receives a raise that places her in a 33% braket.

So I wrote at .33(x-6,500). Seemed simply enough, but I guess maybe it was too simple. The book answer is .33(1.25x-6,500). What I don't understand is where the 1.25 came from.
I don't either unless there was more information than you gave us. The book, giving T(x)= .22(x- 6500) is assuming that 22% is the lowest tax bracket. Being in a higher tax bracket, such as 33%, does not mean you pay 33% of taxable income. You pay the lowest percentage, 22% here, on income lower up to the cut off, then the next percentage, which your book is presuming is 33% on income above that. Did your book say what the cutoff between 22% and 33% is?
 
Nope, that was the complete problem. No hidden information. I thought it was a bit confusing & incomplete myself.
 
In my experience there are errata in textbooks, especially math ones. The people that compose the answers do so hurriedly and there is room for error. It could be possible that the answer is simply part of the growing errata that exists in our academic world.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top