Solve x: Algebraically | x^3*e^(-a/x)=b

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around solving the equation x^3 e^{\frac{-a}{x}} = b algebraically, where a and b are constants. Participants explore various methods and approaches to isolate x, including the use of the Lambert W function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to solve for x algebraically, presenting the equation.
  • Another participant questions whether the post is homework-related and suggests isolating logarithmic and non-logarithmic terms.
  • A participant proposes using the Lambert W function, noting its property W(x e^x) = x, and suggests rearranging the equation into a suitable form for applying W.
  • There is a reiteration of the homework question, with a challenge to the effectiveness of isolating terms, suggesting it may not aid in solving the equation.
  • Another participant expresses interest in the Lambert W function after researching it, indicating a willingness to explore further.
  • A participant claims to have found a solution, presenting x = \frac{a}{3W(\frac{ab^{-1/3}}{3})} as their answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solve the equation. While some advocate for the Lambert W function, others question the effectiveness of isolating terms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective method.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of the Lambert W function and the effectiveness of isolating terms in this context.

Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
How would you solve for x algebraically?

[tex]x^3 e^{\frac{-a}{x}} = b[/tex]

where a and b are some constants.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this homework? If so, I can move it.

Start by isolating the logarithmic terms and the non-log terms. What can you do to get the x^3 away from the e^ term? Once you do that, what can you do to both sides of the equation to get rid of the e^?
 
The Lambert W function is the first thing to try when you have something that looks like that. It has the property that W(x e^x) = x. So try to rearrange that into the form f(x) e^f(x) = C for some constant C, and then apply W to both sides to get f(x)=W(C).
 
berkeman said:
Is this homework? If so, I can move it.

Start by isolating the logarithmic terms and the non-log terms. What can you do to get the x^3 away from the e^ term? Once you do that, what can you do to both sides of the equation to get rid of the e^?
I don't think that's going to help. If you do that, then you are just trapping x inside the natural log function instead of the exponential function.
 
StatusX said:
The Lambert W function is the first thing to try when you have something that looks like that. It has the property that W(x e^x) = x. So try to rearrange that into the form f(x) e^f(x) = C for some constant C, and then apply W to both sides to get f(x)=W(C).
Wow! That's news to me. I searched the lambert W function on Wikipedia and I have to say it is pretty interesting. Let me see what I can do...
 
Got it!. I am 99% sure that the answer is:
[tex]x = \frac{a}{3W(\frac{ab^{-1/3}}{3})}[/tex].
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K