Solve x+y=5 & x^x+y^y=31 | Get Help Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter abia ubong
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The simultaneous equations x+y=5 and x^x+y^y=31 can be approached by substituting y with 5-x in the second equation. The resulting equation does not have a solution expressible in elementary functions, but it can potentially be solved using the Lambert W function. The confirmed solutions are x=3, y=2 and x=2, y=3, which satisfy both equations. These two pairs are likely the only solutions to the problem. The discussion emphasizes the limitations of solving such equations with standard methods.
abia ubong
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
hey i need help with this its a simul eqn ,here it is ,
x+y=5,x^x+y^y=31.any help will be appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abia ubong said:
hey i need help with this its a simul eqn ,here it is ,
x+y=5,x^x+y^y=31.any help will be appreciated
Why do I feel I have seen this before? :rolleyes:

(2,3)

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
can i get a solution plssssssssssssssss
 
This is, after all, the second time you have posted this question: all I can do is give the same answer I did before: from x+ y= 5, y= 5- x so the second equation can be written xx+ (5-x)5-x= 31. That equation cannot be solved (for arbitrary right hand side) by any elementary functions. It is possible that such an equation can be solved by the "Lambert W function".

However, as was explained the last time this was posted, in this particular problem,
33+ 22= 31 so x= 3, y= 2 and x= 2, y= 3 are solutions. They are probably the only solutions. It shouldn't be too difficult to check that.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top