Solving 4th Degree Equation: √x+y=7, √y+x=11

  • Thread starter Thread starter obing
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the system of equations √x + y = 7 and √y + x = 11, which leads to a fourth-degree equation. Participants suggest isolating y in one equation and substituting it into the other to simplify the problem. This method results in a quartic equation that can be complex to solve, but one solution identified is x = 9, with y = 4. The conversation also touches on the potential for extraneous solutions and the use of graphing tools to visualize the equations. Ultimately, the main solutions derived from the equations are x = 9 and y = 4.
obing
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
√x+y=7
√y+x=11
solving this equation using x=-b√b2-4ac/2a for finding the root is impossible

the equation turns out to be of 4th degree

or two quadratic eq. can anybody help

this isn't a homework , just wanted to know ...;)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you're trying to solve for x in these equations, isolate y in either the first or second and then substitute it into the other equation.

\sqrt{x}+y=7 (1)

\sqrt{y}+x=11 (2)

Rearranging (2) to make y the subject:

\sqrt{y}=11-x

y=(11-x)^2

Now substitute into (1):

\sqrt{x}+(11-x)^2=7

To simplify this it's important to try get rid of the square root. This would imply squaring, but remember if we just squared both sides as it is, something like (\sqrt{a}+b)^2=a+2b\sqrt{a}+b^2 so we don't really get rid of the root, we just create more problems.

So instead, isolate the \sqrt{x} and then square both sides.

Yes you will get a quartic (4th degree) equation and it is generally very complicated to solve, unless you're in luck and this question was devised to have nice, rational roots in which case you could then use the rational root theorem to find them.
But I doubt this since it sounds like you created the problem yourself.
 
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt%28x%29%3D7-%2811-x%29^2

According to this, one real solution, 9, and one complex solution, which I won't attempt to copy...
 
Certainly, x=9 is a solution.

If you continue to solve and finally end with the quartic and then solve that for x, you're given 4 real solutions. Some of these however could be extraneous solutions.

But look at what wolfram gives as solutions to the original system of equations:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt(x)+y=7,+sqrt(y)+x=11"

Also, graphmatica draws \sqrt{y}+x=11 as the parabola y=(11-x)^2 which is fine except that for x>11 it does not satisfy the first equation. And this really stumped me at first.

Well, I'm stumped. Is the only solution x=9 or are there more complex solutions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks guys :)

ive found a way out


if we take x= l2

and y=n2

then √l2 +y= 7 (√x+y=7)


√n2+x =11 (√y+x=11)

which becomes l2+y-7=0 (getting rid of root)



n2+x-11=0

2 quadratic equn. :)

ans sloving it gives x=9 y=4
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top