Solving 6th Roots of Unity Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter bosox097
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Unity
bosox097
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you do these two problems?

1. Find the sum of the 6th roots of unity.
2. Find the product of the 6th roots of unity.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The real 2nth roots of unity, for any natural n, are -1 and 1. If a complex number is an mth root of unity (for any m) then its complex conjugate is as well. If z \in \mathbb{C} then z\overline{z} = |z|^2. Thus the product of the 2nth roots of unity (for any n) is -1.

Furthermore, -z is a 2nth root of unity whenever z is. Thus the sum of the 2nth roots of unity (for any n) is 0.

I hope this wasn't a homework problem! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You should look at symetric functions. Take the cubic: (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)=0. Then if this is multiplied out, we get

X^3-X^2(a+b+c)+X(ab+ac+bc)-(abc) = 0.
 
look at the vertices of a regular hexgon and think of vector addition, and then use group theory.
 
(x-a)(x-b)= x2- (a+ b)x+ ab
(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)= x3- (a+ b+ c)x2+ (ab+bc+ ac)x- abc
(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)= x4- (a+ b+ c+ d)x3+ (ab+ac+ ad+ bc+ bd+ cd)x2- (abc+ acd+ bcd)x+ abcd

Do you see the pattern?

Even more simply: the nth roots of unity are equally spaced around the unit circle in the complex plane. What does symmetry tell you about their sum?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top