Solving a 2m Inclined Plane Problem with Negligible Friction

AI Thread Summary
A solid ball on a 2-meter inclined plane with negligible friction is analyzed to find its linear speed at the bottom. The initial approach equated potential energy to kinetic energy and rotational kinetic energy, but confusion arose regarding the interpretation of "negligible friction." Clarifications indicated that if the ball rolls without slipping, the energy conservation approach should consider both translational and rotational motion. The correct final speed, calculated after factoring in the rotational aspect, is approximately 5.3 m/s. This discussion highlights the importance of clear problem statements in physics to avoid misinterpretation.
cortozld
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid ball is at the top of a 2 meter inclined plane. Assuming friction is negligible, what is its linear speed (m/s) as it reaches the bottom?


Homework Equations


PE=mgh
KE=.5mv^2
RKE=.5Iw^2
I of ball=.4mr^2
w=v/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Pretty much what i did was set PE=KE+RKE
which is mgh=.5mv^2+.5(.4mr^2)+w^2 masses cancel out and so does r when v/r is replaced with w

equation is now gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2
if i solve for v i get: 2v^2=2gh/.4= v^2=gh/.4

thus v=sqrt(9.81*2/.4)

v=7.0 m/s

i really have no idea if I am doing this right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In such problems, I find statements like "assume that friction is negligible" confusing.

If friction is really negligible, then the ball slides down the incline without rolling. In that case, it might as well be replaced by a sliding block and there is no ω.

If by "assume that friction is negligible" the intent is to indicate that the ball is actually rolling without slipping but frictional losses are negligible (i.e. mechanical energy is conserved), then the problem should state so more clearly.

Your method is correct if you assume that the latter interpretation applies.
 
Yes, your second statement was correct. As for the problem not being specific it's my teacher not me so talk to him :). As for the answer apparently mine is wrong. So if you have any ideas about something I've missed I'd be glad to hear it
 
cortozld said:
equation is now gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2
if i solve for v i get: 2v^2=2gh/.4= v^2=gh/.4

The first line is correct. Can you show me how you get from the first line to v2=gh/0.4?
 
From gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2 I multiplied both sides by 2 to get rid of the .5: 2gh=v^2+.4v^2. Then I divided by .4 and added the v^2s together: 2gh/.4=2v^2. Divided both sides by 2 again to get: gh/.4=v^2.
 
cortozld said:
From gh=.5v^2+.5(.4)v^2 I multiplied both sides by 2 to get rid of the .5: 2gh=v^2+.4v^2. Then I divided by .4 and added the v^2s together: 2gh/.4=2v^2. Divided both sides by 2 again to get: gh/.4=v^2.

Not correct. First you add the v2, then you divide by whatever multiplies the v2. In other words, you factor out the v2 term to get v2(1+0.4).
 
So that means i have 2gh=v^2(1+.4). Then divide by (1+.4): 2gh/(1+.4)=v^2 and vinally solve for v. which is v=sqrt(2*9.81*2)/(1+.4)

so v=5.3 m/s! Thanks a lot :)
 
Back
Top